Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Rookie Babe

Rookie Babe (0)

dracken (246) 05-28-12  04:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (63), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Roughly 100 models, 225 photo scenes and 100 videos.
- Most of the images are at 8000x1200, but a handful are as high as 2048x3072 and some go higher (maybe 25 go as high as 5120x).
- Most girls have a video interview, but it's usually only 5 minutes or less with some pretty standard questions that get repeated for each girl (where do you like to shop, what couldn't you live without etc), some girls also have a bonus video where they talk about themselves, put some make-up on or get dressed. There are one or two solo masturbation scenes, but they are less than 5 minutes as well and not terribly exciting.
- Good light and good framing for the photos. Some great shots of good looking models.
- You also get a written interview with the girl with some playboy like questions (describe your personality, what do you love about your body, etc)
- Decent navigation, easy to download content, good model pages. Overall very decent webdesign, functional and pleasant to use.
Cons: - Very basic site, the photos are the highlight of the site and with only around 40 images in each scene not much is going on here, think Playboy level of softcore. The girls get undressed and pose around a bit, but no close-ups and just one outfit per shoot.
- Videos are here only as a way to help you get to know the girl, but with some very basic questions and only 4 minutes of footage per clip it's hard to get excited about the movies available here.
- While some of the more recent updates are in 5120 resolution some are as low as 1200, when the biggest selling point of the site is the high resolution of the images this is not good. All updates should be high resolution.
- Videos are in pretty bad resolutions 640x400 and not really well lit.
- When trying to stream a video I sometimes got an error that the video wasn't found..not sure why. It was rather infrequent, but still
Bottom Line: I joined the site because several of the girls looked incredibly hot and I expected something similar to the cyber playboy club or met art.

I didn't go into the site expecting hardcore action or even seeing the girls masturbate, but even so I ended up being disappointed by the content here. A lot of the scenes have around 30 images and they are all shot in the same location and same outfit.

Several of the galleries are just the girl standing in front of a white wall or a brick wall or on a couch in front of a white wall. In fact I noticed that they don't even like to move the girls around too much. If a scene is shot in a hotel on a bed, don't expect the girl to also maybe pose in a chair or standing up next to the bed, they will have her maybe stand on the bed, but that's it. I understand that you would need to set the lights again and move equipment around, but when your entire site is dedicated to images you have to offer a bit more.

I also mentioned the outfits, the vast majority of girls are dressed in jeans and t-shirts or very plain skirts. There are maybe one or two scenes where the girl is wearing a corset or stockings and high heels. But for the most part there is nothing here that I couldn't see walking down the street.

Now don't get me wrong I don't mind that the girls bring their own clothes to these shoots, but the reason I would pay for a site that has only softcore images and under 100 images per set would be because I get to see the girls in different outfits, in different poses and under different angles, in glamor shots as well as outdoor shots, here the diversity is minimal.

The content just doesn't feel worth it. I could go to Met-art or X-art and get the same gorgeous looking models in a lot better looking images. (mind you not technically speaking, the photos here are great, well lit and professionally taken, but most of the time the photographer could have chosen better ways to present the girls.)

The other attractive aspect of the site for me was the idea that you could get to know the girls, get to know their unique personality, at least that's what the FAQ of the site promised. I guess the videos are meant to help here, but the low resolution, short length makes it hard to enjoy the limited clips available. The interviews are very brief and don't really help. Compared to Littlemutt for example, you don't get any feel for the models here.

The one area the site shines in is the diversity of the models, they have some gorgeous looking black and asian models. This is one area that I really enjoyed and is lacking from many other photo sites.

In the end the site has some great models but just doesn't use them as well as they could. If we had more outfits, more locations, more video interviews and daily updates in high definition this would be a great site. As it stands now I would recommend Met-art, X-art even Nubiles over this site.

P.S. It only gets a 70 because the site design is very well done and the models themselves are incredible looking.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.

  Be the first to reply to dracken!

  Reply To Review

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.