Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Pretty 4ever

Pretty 4ever (0)

Denner (235) 08-17-07  08:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (77), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good quality photos

Exclusive videos og photos

Zip in 3 sizes 1200, 2000 and 3456 px

Some very cute/sexy teens, but most seen on other sites

Fair price
Cons: Since this is quite a new site the amount of content is somewhat average/low: 63 galleries - 24 videos

Unstable quality for videos - some good, some ok and some really blurred

Slow download

I little too much focus on outdoor-photo and video (after my taste)
Bottom Line: Pretty4ever is a new and somewhat fresh site - but again maybe they try to do like similar sites:
Met Art, Teen Star Magazine and of course their sister-site Watch4Beauty.

Yes, this is a russian based thing and some of the videos sure reflects it: A russian guy talks to the girl in the video and tells her what to do in either russian and some weird english - quite a bit of a turnoff.

Other videos only have background music

Even if it's a sistersite of W4B this one is not as pro - looks like W4B-wannabe in several ways.

The photos are good in quality, but someone should teach the cameraguy how to use photoshop and what they use - I don't like photos where they cut off the girls hand or feet and even top of the head.

There sure are some cute girls on both photo and video - but the pickin' is slim. Out of the 24 videos less than half are in good quality.

I've downloaded 6 good videos and a couple of galleries, thats all I found worse putting on my HD.
I'll probably cancel rebill

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Drooler (220) I second the comment about cutting off the top of the girl's head, her arms, part of an ass cheek, etc. For God's sake, the photos go up to 3456px, so all of the girl can be in a shot. No need to get so damned space-efficient that we have to chop away at the subject with a photo editor.

But there's one exception: legs from the upper thighs down can be cut off in those shots where the girl presents her lovely behind -- without her hands grabbing it in every shot. And please have her looking at the camera! I hate it when they look uninterested.

Technically, this comment's for you Denner, but I want photographers and content editors to read this, too.

Thanks for the review; it presents the important info in concise form.

08-18-07  04:42am

Reply To Message


Denner (235) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

Thanks for the comment from Drooler.

We can hope that the people at Pretty4ever read both (My review and Droolers comment).

After all, we ARE the users AND customers!

08-18-07  08:51am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.