Review Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (218)
|
I second the comment about cutting off the top of the girl's head, her arms, part of an ass cheek, etc. For God's sake, the photos go up to 3456px, so all of the girl can be in a shot. No need to get so damned space-efficient that we have to chop away at the subject with a photo editor.
But there's one exception: legs from the upper thighs down can be cut off in those shots where the girl presents her lovely behind -- without her hands grabbing it in every shot. And please have her looking at the camera! I hate it when they look uninterested.
Technically, this comment's for you Denner, but I want photographers and content editors to read this, too.
Thanks for the review; it presents the important info in concise form.
|
08-18-07 04:42am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Denner (233)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
Thanks for the comment from Drooler.
We can hope that the people at Pretty4ever read both (My review and Droolers comment).
After all, we ARE the users AND customers!
|
08-18-07 08:51am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|