Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Girls Do Porn

Girls Do Porn (1)

Active
79
pat362 (369) 03-04-12  06:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They currently have 147 videos.
+The majority of the models are unknowns and this is possibly the only video they will shoot.
+All the models are in their late teens to early 20's and most of them are quite beautiful.
+All the videos can be downloaded in WMV and the resolution is 720x480.
+They update with at least one new video a week.
Cons: -You must remain a member for at leat 2 months before you can stream or download the HD videos and that at the full price. They only offer a reduction in price for members that have been active for more than 3 months.
-The videos are all shot in an hotel room and the lighting is not always adequate.
-The person filming the scenes lacks imagination so the bulk of the videos are all shot in the same way so they all have the same flaws and they all shot using the same caera angles.
-Most of the models are atractive but a good percentage of them have more than one tatoo.
-There are no pics whatosever.
-The content is not dated
-The site's navigation is beyond awful. You can only move by selecting a page on the bottom of the site or clicking on the model which always reverts to the first page of the site.
-The male in the videos is never seen above the chest so that also limts the possible shots.
Bottom Line: *This is my second vist in less than a year and I think it will be my last. This is sad because the site manages to hire some really attractive young women that are willing to do hardcore porn but the guys shooting the porn is incompetent and all the sites flaws get more annoying with each visit so that it makes the experience less appealing now than when I was last a member.

*A very annoying thing is that the bulk of the videos aren't identified so you have to do some research before downloading them so that you can at least put the model's name on the file. Then there's the awfull navigation system that does not allow you to go back to where you were once you click on a particular page since the system always returns to the first page regardless of where you were on the site.

*You would think that a video that's not shot in POV or with a tripod would manage not to look as though it was but you'd be wrong because this is exactly how most of the videos look like on this site. The guy shooting the videos manages to always use the same angles and positions in the videos so that they actually look like they are shot in a POV style or filmed using a tripod.

*I can understand a site wanting to reward their long term members by offering HD videos to those that stick with the site for more than one month but if you're going to do that then make sure the second month is half the price. Otherwise it makes the site one of the most expensive one on the net when it comes to HD content.*

**If you want to see some unknown attractive young women have hardcore sex and don't care too much about the camera angles and the lighting then you should be very happy with this site. If camera angles, lighting and variety in shots is important than stay away.**

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) Attractive models, but the videos sound like a waste of time. And with site navigation problems, plus whatever, makes this a site that I would only join after I had explored much better sites.
03-06-12  01:27pm

Reply To Message

2

pat362 (369) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

Sadly the videos aren't very well shot and since this is all you get then I say save your money.
03-06-12  06:42pm

Reply To Message

3

Cybertoad (104)
Thats too bad as hey really look like Attractive models,
little surfing and I was interested. Glad there are reviews
as I might have joined.

03-08-12  05:37pm

Reply To Message

4

gaypornolover (38) Now this sounds like a classic case of a site with a new, totally fresh idea with lots of great unknown models making a mess of things by being too amateur! Such a shame - I've come across a lot of sites like this. You need the fresh idea of a smaller site combined with the professionalism of a more established site really. I sometimes wonder if bigger sites could offer their services to start-up sites to get them more professional and then share the profits.
Excellent review - sounds like the kind of site I'd join for a month or so until the issues became too much for me and I regretfully have to leave!

03-09-12  07:50am

Reply To Message

5

pat362 (369) REPLY TO #4 - gaypornolover :

This stype of stuff is actually quite old because Ed Power or Pierre Woodman was doing this years before this site existed and doing significantly better.

The fact that the girls are all amateurs isn't the problem. It's because the guy responsible for shooting the videos is an idiot. You'd think that a guy who has been doing this type of content for nearly 2 years would have gotten better but he isn't. At least he is not getting worse but that's not necessarily a compliment.

The first big mistake I can see is that they make sure that none of the shots include the face of the male performers. This limits the possible angles you can shoot from to the point where you might as well be doing POV or tripod only videos.

I didn't use the cost of the site in my review because I would still think the videos suck at 20$ but it would be easier to tell someone to give it a try if is wasn't 30$.

03-09-12  06:24pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.