| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (192)
|
Attractive models, but the videos sound like a waste of time. And with site navigation problems, plus whatever, makes this a site that I would only join after I had explored much better sites.
|
03-06-12 01:27pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
pat362 (332)
|
REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :
Sadly the videos aren't very well shot and since this is all you get then I say save your money.
|
03-06-12 06:42pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Cybertoad (92)
|
Thats too bad as hey really look like Attractive models,
little surfing and I was interested. Glad there are reviews
as I might have joined.
|
03-08-12 05:37pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
gaypornolover (38)
|
Now this sounds like a classic case of a site with a new, totally fresh idea with lots of great unknown models making a mess of things by being too amateur! Such a shame - I've come across a lot of sites like this. You need the fresh idea of a smaller site combined with the professionalism of a more established site really. I sometimes wonder if bigger sites could offer their services to start-up sites to get them more professional and then share the profits.
Excellent review - sounds like the kind of site I'd join for a month or so until the issues became too much for me and I regretfully have to leave!
|
03-09-12 07:50am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
pat362 (332)
|
REPLY TO #4 - gaypornolover :
This stype of stuff is actually quite old because Ed Power or Pierre Woodman was doing this years before this site existed and doing significantly better.
The fact that the girls are all amateurs isn't the problem. It's because the guy responsible for shooting the videos is an idiot. You'd think that a guy who has been doing this type of content for nearly 2 years would have gotten better but he isn't. At least he is not getting worse but that's not necessarily a compliment.
The first big mistake I can see is that they make sure that none of the shots include the face of the male performers. This limits the possible angles you can shoot from to the point where you might as well be doing POV or tripod only videos.
I didn't use the cost of the site in my review because I would still think the videos suck at 20$ but it would be easier to tell someone to give it a try if is wasn't 30$.
|
03-09-12 06:24pm
Reply To Message
|
