Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit DDF Network

DDF Network (6)

RustyJ (145) 02-02-12  11:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)

Intentionally misleading?

It used to be easy to spot recycled scenes since they were usually in lower resolution than 1080p. Well, not anymore since they seem to sometimes stamp "new" updates with 1080p-logo even when the highest available resolution might be 672x378.

It doesn't fool a subscriber longer than one click and then only frustrates. Those previewing and considering joining however might not see the truth?

I'd love to be proven wrong.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (3)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Denner (233) Thanks for this update from RustyJ...
Another - alas - not so fine recommendation concerning the problems (reediting) at DDF - sorry to say: The ongoing problems with reediting..is still a bummer...
I used to love that site/network - but I'm not so sure anymore.
I'd be great to have some WM coming back here...

02-03-12  08:30am

Reply To Message

2

pat362 (369) I see it dfifferently than you because I don't think it was ever easy to identify recycled material unless you were a past member. I stopped caring about DDF a long time ago in large part because they started to delete scenes from one site to then move it to different site and pretend that it's a new update. I know most studios are having a hard time with the bad economy but these guys started doing that before the economy was bad. They are just more obvius now.
02-03-12  09:48am

Reply To Message

3

RustyJ (145) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Well yeah, I still love them for what they make. It's my #2 network of choice and I absolutely think their quality is the best but this is just so obivious and useless that it makes me wonder why.
02-03-12  10:26am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.