Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Jugg Master

Jugg Master (0)

Jutti24 (12) 01-26-12  03:56am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of different women - the non-membership page shows a lot of what you will be able to watch in the members-area

Affordable and cheap!

Lots of content.

Easy to download sets or videos using download-managers
Cons: Old image content isn't very high-res. (but new content is OK!)

Old videos aren't in particularly high quality (but new content is OK!)

Site navigation is a little bit "creative" but OK overall. No surprises.
Bottom Line: Very enjoyable considering that the membership fee is in the sub-20 USD range and there is lots of content.
Although keep in mind: there's only softcore, so don't expect more.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) When you say softcore, does it normally go to full nudity?

( & I don't mean the dodgy version of 'nude' that involves having some clothes on).

Cap'n. :0)

01-26-12  09:20am

Reply To Message


BubbaGump (18) Hi. Thanks for the review and info. I had actually came upon this site last week when browsing through the niche link. Signed up for a one-month non-reccuring to replace my Score sub. Will add my review in a bit after I have had time to really go through the site.

I agree about the cost. It's the main reason I signed up. I have always been a collector of boob-mags over the years--Juggs, Gent, Score, Voluptuous, etc.. Considering that the price is only $16.99 and a single magazine today costs about $12, that's not a bad deal, especially when you can download all the galleries. Many of the models here I have seen and know quite well from the past. I have seen photo sets never seen before I so I think this material is pretty exclusive to the site.

It won't be for everyone, however. The models are of the thick and plump variety, and if you're not into BBW, it probably might not be your thing. If you like those huge, natural breasts with those saucer-sized aroela, this is quite good and the photography actually impressess me--much better than I thought it would be based on the rather rag-tag appearance of the site itself. Also, like you said, no hardcore and seeing genitals is rare. The photos are more of the classic, conservative variety and full nudes are rare. It seems to be all about the breasts.

01-26-12  04:23pm

Reply To Message


Jutti24 (12) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

Afaik it's more softcore without seeing genitals or "pink" spread shots...
Nice posing though of the girls...

01-27-12  11:54am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) Thanks for the additional info.

Cap'n. :0)

01-27-12  02:08pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.