Review Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Capn (28)
|
Yes, that has always puzzled me why the bottom ranking you are allowed to give is 50.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-07-12 05:43am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Khan PU Staff
|
REPLY TO #1 - Capn :
That was explained in the announcement made when we launched (after public beta testing) You can see it at:
http://www.pornusers.com/announcements.html#255
|
01-07-12 06:52am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
slategrey (13)
|
I Really thought this website was pretty good (when download was available), but i do agree on the major lack of new hd content, seem like its the same ones from months ago. I was also bummed that you couldnt download any videos, was some real good ones in the hd category plus im not a big streaming fan.
|
01-08-12 08:16pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|