Comment Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
otoh (50)
|
Not at all - I'd say it's roughly 2:1 Photo sets to videos. The size of the sets doesn't bother me at all - Ellen Stagg does similar size sets at Stagg Street, a favourite site. It just means the photographer has spent some time editing the set down to the best shots - with a good photographer you respect that decision and the sets are better for it.
And here especially, the pictures are quite stark - I feel they would lose the edge if there were too many of them in a set. The sets are zipped, but only go up to 1600px; I'd have preferred a bit higher res.
I'm liking this site far more than I'd guessed!
|
11-23-11 12:22am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Capn (28)
|
REPLY TO #1 - otoh :
I remember being harangued at ATKNH for daring to suggest that 100 - 120 shots was quite sufficient for a comprehensive photoset! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-25-11 08:08am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|
