Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn (7)

Active
85
tangub (151) 10-31-11  01:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: TBP/PU discount price of $19.99 makes the site excellent value
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing.
Daily updates usually alternating between a photo shoot and video
Mostly exclusive content
Most recent photo sets have 3 size options, 1000, 2000 and 4000px
Zip downloads in each size
No watermark/site name on recent photos
Videos usually have a choice of 720p wmv or 720p, 480p and 360p mp4. A few of the latest videos also go up to 1080p full hd.
Videos can also be streamed in 3 resolutions and they also have them split into 1 minute long clips for streaming or download which is useful if you want to preview part of the video before deciding if you want to download it.
Run times and file sizes all displayed
It’s nice to see a site that actually takes the trouble to give the zips and video downloads proper file names matching the name of the scene and now also has the model name included since rearadmiral mentioned it in his recent review.
Responsive webmaster.
Cons: Upgrading your membership to include the All Sites Access from within the member’s area is expensive at $69 so if you think you might want network access better to pay the extra $10 upfront (see my previous comment and webmaster explanation on this topic)
Download speeds were below average for me.
I found their photo browser awkward to use, i couldn’t move around the photos using my scroll bars or keyboard direction arrows, not sure if that was me doing something wrong
Much of the photo content only has a maximum resolution of 1000px
The oldest videos don’t have the HD option as you’d expect on any site that’s been around a number of years
Nothing much in the way of model info or bios, name and age is about all you get.
Some video files seem unnecessarily large e.g. a video of Beata I downloaded had a bitrate of 33,000 kbps and came in at a whopping 911 MB for an 11 minute video
Bottom Line: Being a fan of softcore glamour/nude art style photography based sites such as Met, MPL, and W4B it was with some trepidation that I signed up here not really knowing if they had the kind of content that would be to my taste but I was tempted in by the collection of stunning fresh looking young models in the tour. There’s little information on the models in the site apart from a name and age but I’m assuming most of them would be Russian or Eastern European. Most of them have their ages listed as 18 or 19 and to be fair most of them do look teen to early 20s and the site does pretty much stick to the young theme throughout in the way of clothing and scenarios.

Although the site has been around several years with content dating back to 2006 online it’s only really in the last 12 to 18 months that they have been taking the addition of high resolution photo shoots to the site seriously so from my point of view they have some way to go to catch up with my favourite photography sites. I did find plenty of models and photo shoots that I liked but about two thirds of what I downloaded only had a resolution of 1000 x 665 with the rest a mixture of 1500, 2000 or 4000px on the long side. There is a mention on the site that they have plans to increase the photo resolution to 6000px but I’ve not seen any in that size yet.

I found the layout and presentation of the site really nice here. When browsing the model index the models had nice big preview pictures and when browsing the photo galleries the thumbnail previews were a good size and also included a slide control to increase or decrease the thumb size which was a cool feature I’ve not seen before. Each photo set and video also comes with a selection of clickable tags to allow you to easily find similar type content, e.g. solo, striptease, lesbian, hardcore, anal, cum in mouth etc.

If it’s videos you’re after I don’t see how this site can fail to impress, well as long as you’re not looking for busty milfs that is. You can find these hot young models in most types of action including solo, masturbation, toys, lesbian, hardcore B/G, threesomes with niches such as anal, peeing and fisting covered. I’m not hugely into videos but from what I’ve seen the quality throughout the site is pretty decent overall. You’ll need a lot of disk space to save these HD files as they can often be up to 2 GB in size. The only slight downside to these large files is that I found the download speed below average and on a couple of occasions so slow that the site was virtually unusable although it appears that may have been a temporary problem.

Overall a highly recommended site if you’re into the “teen” niche and one I’ll probably come back to again in the future if they keep on growing the amount and quality of the photo sets.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) There have been 3 reviews about this site in the last 2 weeks.
If I didn't know better, I would think the site itself was paying for the reviews, since the reviews are generally positive.
However, since I wrote one of the three reviews, and I got no payment for my review (except for tickets from PU), I think the reviews are honest and well-meaning.

And all three reviews were excellent, including yours.

It just struck me as unusual, because this is not a site like MetArt or Nubiles, which usually attracts a lot of attention.

But the site (and network) does have some lovely models. So I think the attention is warranted.

10-31-11  02:32pm

Reply To Message

2

tangub (151) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

Lol...yes i agree very suspicious looking. I think the attention the site has been getting has a lot to do with the newly offered discount at PU/TBP, for me it's one of those borderline sites that i probably wouldn't have joined without the incentive of the discount to lure me in.
10-31-11  03:00pm

Reply To Message

3

Cybertoad (92) Ok no joke I am going to be doing a review too.
I read the last review a few weeks ago and joined.
So you may see another in the next month.
No I didn't get paid LOL.
But very interesting co-ink

10-31-11  03:27pm

Reply To Message

4

rearadmiral (240) It does seem odd that a bunch of us are posting positive reviews, and in a way I guess you could argue that I got paid. The points I earned for the week I posted that review earned me the top spot in the raffle for the first time ever.

I suspect that a lot of the interest was started when slutty posted that there was a new site, Skinny Super Girl. (I still think that title doesn't do Gloria justice. It would be better if it were called "Holy-flying-fuck is She Ever Fucking Incredible!") I'd never heard of these sites before then. But like you, tangub, this will be a site I come back to over and over again.

Great review too. I didn't mention that the lack of biographical info on the models was a con for me too. Since many of them don't speak English it would be a good way to learn a bit more about them. I PROMISE I wouldn't stalk Gloria...

10-31-11  05:23pm

Reply To Message

5

elephant (64) Very good review Tangub

Great to see this site getting attention I agree, its kind of being in the sidelines for a while and not getting the credit I think it deserves as the quality of nearly everything about it has got a whole lot better in the last year or 2 and I think it seems to be paying off for them, they appear to be having a refreshed look on how to publish porn and coming at it from a new angle other than the usual.

The upgrade price is a bit steep though I agree, not very tempting, still I guess it makes joining both from the offset much more appealing.

11-06-11  01:42am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.