Webcam Hackers (1)
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
||- Around 50 videos with updates pretty regularly (every 7 days it seems).
- The scenes are supposedly in HD (1250x720), but in my opinion even the HD looks grainy and rather poor quality (I guess it's all part of the webcam look, but to me they took it a step too far with some scenes looking as bad as a live cam strip show)
- As the title suggests this site is all about girls with webcams. Some of them strip in front of said webcam, some get fucked (sadly only one camera angle) and a few masturbate solo.
- They have the same high quality of models the rest of the site has and I believe all "amateurs" on here have scenes on other sites in the network.
- Most scenes have a bit of a story. A girl talks to her boyfriend and strips for him, a foreign exchange student has sex with her boyfriend, etc. Nothing too crazy, but it all stays in the same theme of a webcam hack and it's rather hot.
- Access to the network is included (tons and tons of good sex scenes here.)
||- Like I mentioned above the videos although good resolution are still a bit on the grainy side and several of them have the webcam specific delay, which really makes the scene hard to get into. Also some scenes have serious color issues (when a girl's vagina looks purple something is seriously wrong)
- Some scenes are very short (5 minutes) and there are some scenes that feel like they belong together in one video but were split into two in order to make the site look bigger. (There is one Madison Ivy scene where she masturbates then another scene where has sex in the exact same place).
- The entire network needs a better way to preview videos. Right now their thumbnails are not very clear.
- Some girls are really not that interesting in solo action. There is one scene where a girl pulls on her labia and asks if we can tell which one she pulls on more. Titillating stuff indeed.
||Overall this site suffers from some limitations that are inherent in the type of content it's trying to produce. When you're trying to generate amateur content you pretty much force yourself to have rather poor camera work, only one angle and sometimes awkward interactions (like I mentioned above some girls do well alone with a camera and some are just weird)
Also they have a scene where two girls get into adult diapers and pretend to be sumo wrestlers. I guess that fits the site and it's rather funny, but I'm not sure if it's content that I want to pay 25 bucks for. I guess you have to look at this site as a bonus along with the much, much better sites like Massage Creep and 18 Years Old.
Aside from the sometimes questionable content I would have loved longer scenes. The average video is around 10 minutes with many running under that. Give the girls some more toys and more outfits and there should be no issue making longer videos.
So, we have rather poor action, short scenes and bad camerawork. So far the site manages to fail on every count possible. We do have several hot models, but why bother trying to watch the scenes here when a click away they are showing off with good lighting and multiple camera angles?
Now don't get me wrong, the premise of the site is good, we need more amateur content even if amateur means pornstar paid to masturbate in front of an expert camera crew. But for the love of God don't settle with actual webcam footage. That is never going to look good, it's just a waste of time and money.
Bottom line: the latest updates on here show improvement. Maybe it's just my hopeful optimism but the camera work seems cleaner and they are starting to focus on sex scenes as opposed to solo masturbation. Also the u8pdates are coming regularly and they seem to really want to push this amateur-like content, which is great.
More HD updates, more hot models and longer scenes and we should have a great site with a unique premise. (please no more adult diapers though... there is no need for that.)
P.S. The score reflects mu hope that the site will improve, right now I would not join this network just for the violation series of sites.
Reply To Review