Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Karup\'s PC

Karup's PC (0)

monty4321 (3) 10-23-11  09:12pm
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)

Pic Sizes and quality?

Does anyone know if the pic sizes are larger now with good detail. I looked at the review on here and it says "1500X1000". That's pretty small for today. I have a pretty decent sized monitor.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (4)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


Hooliganzo (4) Sets after around 2007 offer the 1500x1000 zips. I think it is the bare minimum for good resolutions. I use my tv as a monitor which I run at 1920x1080. Images in full screen at this resolution on a 40 inch tv look good. The older sets look decent between 2004-07. The sets 2003 and before are pretty poor.

If you like to zoom in you can zoom in a little with the 1500 sets and still look good.

10-24-11  12:14pm

Reply To Message


Denner (235) Monty, since I recommended this site on your request let me say this:

Karups PC is like so many major sites with a long background (since 1997):

Newer material is of course much better than what you find from early 2000, before and a little after.
But generally Karup's PC is still getting better and better regarding both vids and pix quality. Though I also get 1500x1000 checking my sets, they're absolutely fine for full screen viewing.

Like vids, like pix you can't only rely on actual size regarding viewing quality....at least in my experience...and this user is considering yet another rejoin.

10-26-11  05:58am

Reply To Message


monty4321 (3) REPLY TO #1 - Hooliganzo :

thanks guys this was of great help.
10-31-11  03:11pm

Reply To Message


monty4321 (3) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

So last night i made the dive into karups pc. I signed up for a membership.

Sorry guys but here's my first opinion thus far - buyer's remorse. :C

My two main disappointments are:

1) Pic sizes. Indeed the photos are 1500x1000 which are way too small. I have a 26 inch flat screen monitor.

2) Overall pic quality. Not good. If the quality was good, I can sacrifice the photo's size.

My disappointments are only based on viewing with a 26", so I may be a bit biased. That said, I think the pic sizes and quality are fine for someone using a standard laptop.

11-02-11  03:50pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.