Comment Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Khan
PU Staff
|
That review was removed because it was 22 words and no real pro/cons so it didn't meet our minimum standards for a Review. We also do not allow Reviews based on limited trials. The user was invited to resubmit as a Comment.
BTW, we don't make a habit of remarking on individual submissions to others.
I have asked our editors to look into if the site is there or not.
|
09-20-11 03:01pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
BradlyH (11)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Khan :
I completely Understand in all aspects of it. And thank you for looking into it because such a strong point of this site is Warning other users. I feel you will save a lot of disappointment in the future for others.
|
09-20-11 03:25pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|
