Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Teenrotica

Teenrotica (1)

Denner (233) 09-09-11  08:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + An extremely generous amount of models.
+ Not sure – but it seems like entirely exclusive material (see below)
+ Generally hot looking models, most of European origin.
+ Mostly a site concentrating in sets – so vids fans – your're warned.
+ It's like thay say: ”tons of galleries”
+ Zip – in 2 sizes – for sets
+ Mostly fine viewing quality for pix
Cons: - Close to miserable quality in the major amount of vids content – unbelievable for an almost major site in 2011
- Outdated style, design and navigation
- Regional pricing
- Three formats for vids – but none of them gives you any viewing pleasure
- Even some newer vids are a joke in viewing quality
- Too much lez content for my taste
- Even without regional pricing $19.95 it's too expensive for what you get – in vids anyway
- No way of knowing about updates – no date on those
Bottom Line: Oh, yes: bottom line: My personal feeling here is clear – I wasted my money – and that including the fact, that this site deals in regional pricing. But that's only a total secondary issue.

Teenrotica is downright outdated – in style, in navigation, design – and it's almost a scandal (harsh words, I know) that a site that cost $ 19.95 – and for Europeans about $ 29 – has such miserable material in videos.

Despite the preview has a so called UPDATE – that is missing at the members area – Instead you can turn to VIDEOS or GALLERIES for the latest and the first inputs. (or Models without dates)
When browsing for videos you get the new ones first – and being a member years back, I thought: Okay, this site started up in 2006 and videos then were generally not good.
But the new ones in 2011 are in a quality I'd would be ashamed of, if I was behind the site.
The size is all in so called 3:4 – and the viewing quality is simply low down.
Most vids are around 100 Mb in AVI format – and much less in both WMV og MOV. Three formats – save it and get better quality instead.

It's a shame. Because Teenrotica has so many fine models – and I seriously believe it's exclusive.
We all got favorite models – and the material I found of these models (both in pix and vids) I have not seen elsewhere.

This is mostly a site with solo and lez material – both vids and sets. A few hc/bg inputs – and most of these are only bj.
And for a couple of those bj vids – it's lousy editing. No foreplay, no posing – but starts with close ups of bj.....it seems like unfinished bussiness.

Then to the little more positive deals here:
The pix/sets are generally in ok/fine viewing quality. You get a choice of 2 zip download sizes (high and low) – guess no one will go for the low. And you got a pretty good thumbnail preview for all sets.
And you can use the thumbnails to view directly in Small, Large og XL. Do not really see the point, but some may like it.

If I was a pix fan foremost, this site could get a little better score, in my view. But the design, style, navigation AND first of all: those low/very low quality vids – I cannot recommend Teenrotica.
The 65 from this user is entirely due to the sets/models (See PU rating: 60-69 - Does more things wrong than right)

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


dracken (246) Good review man. Sorry to hear that the site is not really up to modern day standards.

Since the site focuses on images, would you mind talking a bit about the images? Like what sizes do you get? If they are HD and competitive to Met-art or such sites I might maybe consider joining...

Thanks anyways for the work on this one :)

09-09-11  09:29am

Reply To Message


tangub (151) I believe this site stopped updating in 2009. I was there in the back end of 2009 and the updates had already stopped and looking through the tour i don't see anything new from when i was there. I think they have removed the dates from the content to cover up the fact they are no longer updating so those poor quality 2011 vids you mention are probably a few years old. As a pic fan i quite enjoyed what i got from the site for what its worth but without updates i won't be going back.
09-09-11  10:19am

Reply To Message


Denner (233) REPLY TO #1 - dracken :

I'm not very tech about pix - but the sets (the large size) I've downloaded says:
Guess that 24b is bits?

Hope that helps!

Or maybe Drooler sees this - he's been a member -and has much more knowledge about pix than I have...

09-10-11  02:35am

Reply To Message


Denner (233) REPLY TO #2 - tangub :

If they really stopped updating in 2009 this should be verified and informed at TBP...
09-10-11  08:09am

Reply To Message


Drooler (218) REPLY TO #3 - Denner :

I don't know what that "24b" means, either. They're 72 dpi (dots per inch), if that's part of any equation. It's a common resolution on the web, 72 dpi.

Anyway ... Teenrotica is what I call a "zombie" site, the kind that lives on well past its days of content-generating life. It's probably a decent "cash cow" for the owners, with no more content to produce and new subscribers coming along to plunk down their dough for a big fat download session.

The funny thing is, Denner, that I thought it deserved a 65 for the pics when I did my review of it 2007! I even said so, but gave it an 80 because of the vids! Ain't that a kick?

Well, these days, it ought to get a 65 just for being a dusty old zombie site, LOL.

Oh, BTW, it is exclusive material, so that speaks well of it. It's also the first site where I saw Lizzie Ryan! Yeeeeooowww!!

09-17-11  12:36pm

Reply To Message


Denner (233) REPLY TO #5 - Drooler :

Drooler, I like that "zombie" site input. That suits it well. Teenrotica is nowhere near "downright lousy" - maybe except for the vids - but I have rally enjoyed quite a few of the pix sets - BUT: with no more updates..."Hasta la vista, baby" - have already canceled rebill.....
09-19-11  06:24am

Reply To Message


Drooler (218) REPLY TO #6 - Denner :

Hey Denner,
Speaking of Zombies (and with all due respect to Rod Argent), I've just noticed that some of the photo content of Lizzie Ryan that was on Teenrotica has been showing up at MC-Nudes. The pics are bigger, but fewer. The Teenrotica stuff of course takes you through a big, long stripping session, with lots of pics, but the MC-Nudes starts kind of "in the middle," shall we say.

FYI ...

10-02-11  08:24am

Reply To Message


Denner (233) REPLY TO #7 - Drooler :

Thanks for that FYI, Ze Droolah.....
But it also makes me wonder:
Why start "in the middle" of an entire photoset?
It kind of reminds me of "wham-bam-thank-you ect...." - where you miss all the "foreplay", which also goes for solo material, sets and vids...I've seen it with vids too many times, alas...

10-03-11  05:37am

Reply To Message


Drooler (218) REPLY TO #8 - Denner :

Yeah, I like photosets to start where things start, with some sexy facial expressions and alluring eyes, and some threads to peel off as the girl is showing you what she got.

So why MC-Nudes prefers to start at a later point is beyond me ... with pics, anyway. Now with vids, it's a different story with Ze Droolah. I like to get them started "in the middle," assuming they're hardcore. (Not MC-Nudes, of course, but hardcore from other points of access.)

I suppose that sounds kinda of inconsistent. Well, it is. And weird, 'cause it's softcore with foreplay but "straight to it" when there's actual sex.

I just don't understand it myself.

10-05-11  12:36pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.