Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Redhead In Heat

Redhead In Heat (1)
Active
50
pat362 (333) 08-25-11  06:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +There are 64 videos which can be downloaded in WMV.
+There are 94 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+CCbill is the CC processor.
Cons: -The videos all fall under bad with crappy 320x240 resolution, bad camera angles, bad lighting, and even a few out of focus shots.
-All the phototsets are 640x480 resolution.
-I'm pretty sure the content is identical to the one found on mandingogirl.
-There is very little info about the videos or phototsets so you have to open the file to find out what you'll get.
-They are still updating with new content but quality is so bad that I'd be willing to bet that it's just recylced content from years ago.
Bottom Line: *Dawn is not your typical bone thin young woman but is instead a pretty chubby all natural red head woman who has a southern accent and likes enjoy having sex with multiple partners at the same time. She seems to favor IR perfromers.

*This site could have been something good but the videos are so bad that tube sites wouldn' bother using them. There is no reason for anyone else to get taken in by their less than honest preview. Videos in 320x240 resolution should not exist today and any site that offers only this type of resolution should close shop right now instead of stealing money from fools like me.

**I'll post a comment about mandingogirl as well because I suspect that they share content or may even have the exact same content. I can't be 100% sure and I'm not joining them to find out. One bad decision is enough for me. Neddless to say avoid mandingogirl because it's not going to be any better than this one**

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

 Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

 BradlyH (11) You have me laughing over here. 320x240 vids and 640x480 pics ? wow.
 08-25-11  06:41pm

Reply To Message

2

 Capn (28) I just made the mistake of looking at the 'tour.'

Popup hell!

Never a good sign.

Cap'n. :0(
 08-25-11  11:32pm

Reply To Message

3

 gaypornolover (38) A good warning review, but you seem to have missed a chunk out - one of your sentences ends mid-sentence - "with multiple partners at the...."

Sounds an awful site of a good model which is always a pity - and pop-up hell is ALWAYS a bad sign.

Thanks for warning people off the site, this is what PU is really useful for.
 08-25-11  11:53pm

Reply To Message

4

 pat362 (333) REPLY TO #3 - gaypornolover :

I've corrected my oversight about that mid-sentence.
 08-26-11  05:59am

Reply To Message

5

 gaypornolover (38) REPLY TO #4 - pat362 :

Thanks for that, hope you didn't mind me pointing it out, just didn't want your review to be spoiled by a little mistake it's all too easy to make!
Curious though - what's an IR performer?
 08-26-11  08:01am

Reply To Message

6

 pat362 (333) REPLY TO #5 - gaypornolover :

On the contrary. I appreciate when someone points these errors in my review. This way I can correct them before others read it and think I'm an idiot.

IR stands for inrerracial so any performer that is dark skinned can fall under that category. I say can because these performers don't have to be African American to be classified as an IR performer.
 08-26-11  09:59am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.