Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Only CFNM

Only CFNM (0)

mbaya (356) 07-31-11  08:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Part of network of fetish websites, hardglam.com. Many have similar themes.
-Has three choices of video downloads. The best is HD at 1920x1080, 10378 kbps. Excellent. There is a lesser quality download at 854x480, 927 kbps and FLV streaming.
-Photos are zipdownloadable at 1900x1262 and at 1200x797. Most sites do better, but these are acceptable.
-No download limits.
-Works with download managers.
-Delicious English accents.
Cons: -Apparently not updating any longer. Presently has 27 videos, TBP has them at 25 in June of 2009. Another review site has them at 25 in May of 2010.
-Zero search capability. Listed in what I guess was date order only, but without any dates posted.
-I found the concept of a fetish within a specialized niche to be a bit strange, as well as hard to get used to. See below.
-Practically no plot, almost gonzo. Other CFNM sites I have joined have plots that make the action have a sexy context. You don't get nudity, so at least I expect my imagination to get stimulated.
Bottom Line: I have previously been a member of two other CFNM sites that I rather enjoyed. On those sites what I appreciated were sexy ladies doing for fun what on most gonzo type sites are done for male pleasure. For example, why would a woman suck a guy's cock while fully clothed, except that she really wants to do it? After all, he is doing nothing for her. Usually the women seem to be enjoying themselves. Further, a sexy woman in hot clothes gets my imagination going.

What about on this site? Zero imagination. The pretext for the action is usually so weak that it is just unbelievable. This is not fantasy, it is just gonzo, straight to the blow job sex. I like blow jobs as much as the next guy, maybe more so, but every video is the same. Besides that, the content available is just too little. At least if they were updating, you could see the site improving. Only two updates in close to two years is pathetic.

The next problem area came as a surprise. The reason I joined was that I like blow jobs, especially in top quality HD. However, nearly all the videos have the women smoking before, during and after the bj. Its bad enough I had to get used to shaved women in porn, but smoking? I tried, but I simply can't get used to it. I could never have sex with a woman who smoked, even if not in front of me. Smoking is a dirty, unhealthy habit that makes a woman smell and is not at all sexy, sorry. I did not realize how strongly I felt on this topic until this site. I kept telling myself, focus on the bj, focus on how hot the women are, etc. I like a lot of niche, even fetish material, but this site reached my limit.

A fetish within a niche website most definitely limits its market. No wonder this is an archive site.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) Well, if nothing else, it distilled out another dislike for you. :0/

Cap'n. :0)

07-31-11  04:21pm

Reply To Message


gaypornolover (38) Sounds one weird site to me - like you I don't get the smoking thing at all. I guess it might be to make the women appear relaxed and like they're in control but to me it's a bit odd and makes it sound like they're not really into it - who smokes DURING sex if they're not bored?! After maybe!

The whole point of CFNM is fantasy so the gonzo style is just not appropriate for it - sounds like a lazy site where they haven't understood the genre at all, just tried to cash in one a new craze.

I hate non-updating sites too!

Great review, will leave this one WELL alone.

08-01-11  08:48am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.