Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Just Cute Girls

Just Cute Girls (0)

Drooler (220) 06-27-11  01:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Exclusive content and a good amount of it (goes back to January 2009). Over 200 videos and 930 photo sets
+Daily updates
+Decent price
+Some very nice looking-models; some are well-known
+Photos AND zips come in four sizes (in pixels): 504x756, 1008x1512, 2016x3024, and the very large 4032x6038
+Good image quality in the photos and videos
+Unique “retina” feature lets you zoom in on parts of a photo
+Every video is both streaming and downloadable. Earlier ones are each WMV 1280x720 and WMV 640x360; from October 2010, they switched to Quicktime 1920x1080, 1280x720, and 640x360.
+User can set viewing preferences (thumbnails per page, opening photo in new window, etc.)
+Save your login once, then just click the member’s link and you’re in every time
+Appealing design and color scheme on white background
+Easy, intuitive navigation
+Snappy search feature! Just start typing the model’s name and there she is! Or search by a list of attributes and everyone pops right on in.
Cons: -Not a huge number of models; not a small number either (about 64)
-Some of the models are not very sexy (tats, piercings, flab, fate)
-Thumbnails are too small
-Downloads are slow, especially with videos (160 kbps, for instance, and that’s after several logins and several days). Or this: 30 minutes wait for a 300MB video.
-Don’t even bother with the streaming option on the videos; it’s too slow to get going.
-Photoshoots broken into segments on different dates (at least they’re often similar dates)
-The photography is sometimes amateurish: girls’ heads get cropped off at various points; shadows cover faces outdoors; sometimes there’s simply no composition to speak of.
-(Minor quibble) photos and videos of individual models found under “Albums” – not the clearest choice of words
Bottom Line: This is a softcore site, mostly solo modeling with very little in the way of toys and just a few light-petting girl-girl scenes.

Some of the better-known models are here, including Lux Cassidy, Sara Jaymes, Riley Jensen (who only appears with Sara), Randy Moore, Carlotta Champagne, Sarah Jain, Jenni Gregg (the Czech bubblebutt blond), and Annabelle Lee.

Some of the others – from the younger Ashley and Odette to the more fully blossomed Renne G and Amber D -- are pretty easy on the eyes, too.

So how does this “retina” feature work? First of all, bring your own retinas (-;). Now, open a pic, choose a “retina” size (small, med, or large), then mouse over the pic. A circular area will follow your mouse movement, revealing in greater size the “stuff” that she got that you want magnified.

Yeah, that’s right. Magnified. I didn’t know that retinas could magnify. Mine can’t. Oh, well.

One thing I really like about this site is the apparent obsession with ass. There are LOTS of shoots done on beds indoors or blankets outdoors in which the lady lays very invitingly prone to your deepest wishes.

Another good thing is that the photo updates have at least 50 pics, and some go beyond 100. Since a full shoot might consist of 3-4 updates, there’s a selection of pics at every phase of the “tale,” from stripping to getting nice and belly-down flat on those crisp whites.

With so many pics here, you can sometimes discard the poorly composed ones and still come out with a decent “end result.” Sometimes ...

And that’s my biggest gripe about this site: the lousy composition of too many pics. It’s like, you know she’s is making sweet eyes, but you can’t see them because the top of the pic starts in the middle of her nose! And so on like that.

And so I ask, “Why?” It isn’t as though we’re short on space, what with the 4032x6038 pixel option. Why not just include the girl’s entire head in the photo, especially when her face is showing?

Assy vids are also in supply. I’m not much of a softcore vid fan, but I did get a few samples: nude, redheaded Amber oiling herself and moving around face down in sexual motion; Cyan shaking her money maker over a chaise lounge; Sara Jaymes slowly, slowly undressing on a bed; Sarah Jain, a personal favorite since I discovered her at NextDoorModels, stretching on a bed so quietly you can hear the birds chirping outside.

One thing the vids have in common is that they’re usually pretty quiet. If there’s any steady noise, it’s mostly from the outside.

Clearly, while flawed in photo composition sometimes and in download speed usually, this site is very good in a number of ways, and I would recommend it to any fan of softcore for its considerable exclusive content.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) Yet another find by the Drooler
Thanks, buddy for keeping us updated with - and reviews of - NEW sites!
Just went through the preview, too - and at first view some very average looking models - but you can't always judge the book by it's cover.
And some models really gain when you watch different sets and vids.

06-27-11  03:17am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

You know, I had the same feeling about the models there. I wavered for a while, but decided to get in since there was enough of the ones I knew I'd like. And since then, some of the other ones have grown on me some, even a few with the over-ass tats and such. (Would prefer they'd skipped that bit of "la coiffeuse," of course.)
06-27-11  01:19pm

Reply To Message


slutty (111) Nice, informative review Drooler. Looked like too many tats for me on the preview.

Just curious, what did you mean by fate? Never heard that used in reference to a model's attractiveness before...

06-27-11  09:26pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #3 - slutty :

As I've heard someone else say rather recently, "You were born that way." That kind of fate. The person who said it, a 25-year-old female performer, is someone to whom, IMHO, fate has been kind, mostly anyway.
06-28-11  02:22pm

Reply To Message


slutty (111) REPLY TO #4 - Drooler :

Interesting, never heard it used in that fashion before. Thanks for the information.
06-28-11  04:18pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #5 - slutty :

Well, there were those girls in high school who looked good then, but then what happened? And on the other hand, there were those Plain Janes who turned out to be some really hot and fine stuff in their mid to late twenties. And then, of course, the ones that have always had it -- and the ones that never will.

And why? That Fickle Finger of Fate!

06-28-11  05:55pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.