Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure (2)

Active
76
HeatherMcXxx (10) 05-18-11  09:56am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Trusted User  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models, though in the two years since I last subscribed the quality has fallen somewhat. Thomas recruits some impressive girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, many models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene.
Cons: Thomas seems like a fairly likable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can get rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like "silly girl." (Ay caramba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model typically doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl "show us" what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials. Finally, the girl-next-door trope is often an illusion, since so many of the models are porn starlets pretending to be unknowns.
Bottom Line: Look, if oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long. (I'm surprised this site keeps going, frankly.)

In that month, you'll enjoy lots of attractive girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, although it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) You'll get lots of awkward smiles from the models as they respond to Thomas' dumb and obvious queries. (Thomas: "What are you going to do now?" Model on her knees: "Suck your cock?")

Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.

The music fascinates me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and youthful personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they can be a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) Very nice, readable review. Glad to see you posting again, and hope to see more reviews from you. Also interesting to see some input from one of the few female posters at PU.
05-18-11  12:30pm

Reply To Message

2

otoh (54) Agree with lk2fireone - although this isn't a site on my (increasingly long) shortlist, your review is hugely readable. And - at the risk of getting a slap for seeming patronising - some female input and perspective here is very welcome and appreciated! Hope to see more of your reviews...
05-18-11  01:05pm

Reply To Message

3

Drooler (220) Heather McXxx! Nice to see you back! And thanks for this review. I'd been interested in this site for a while. What you described -- so well, of course -- was pretty much what I thought it would involve. But one helpful thing I couldn't have really anticipated was the shallowness of the verbal interchange.

Reminds me of the joke about the inexperienced starlet who slept with the writer.

05-18-11  03:59pm

Reply To Message

4

HeatherMcXxx (10) REPLY TO #3 - Drooler :

Pray tell ... what's the joke? Or should I figure it out from context? Good to hear from you ... that dog is cute as ever! :)
05-18-11  04:06pm

Reply To Message

5

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #4 - HeatherMcXxx :

You've got a very sly sense of humor, Heather McXxx. Cheers!
05-18-11  04:09pm

Reply To Message

6

DpornGuy (36) Great review, very good points mentioned, short and concise!
05-19-11  06:46am

Reply To Message

7

mbaya (356) Very nice, interesting review. I also was a member a while back. The site is just ok and I am glad that you agree. With all the sites that there are, why did you rejoin?
05-19-11  11:45am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.