Sasha Fucks Dasha (0)
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
-Long period before site timeout.
-No download limits.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Content is dated.
-Photosets and videos default filename for download is the posting date.
||-No streaming option.
-Only 1 definition for video download, a low-quality.
-Only 1 definition for photoset download, a low-quality.
-Very few models at this site. You have Sasha and Dasha, and a very few other models.
-Archive site, no updates since July 2007.
||This site is part of the Diesel Access network.
This is an archive site: the last update was July 2007.
Most of the content features two models: Sasha and Dasha. There are a few other models also featured. The contents are videos and photosets that show the models in an amateur home-style shoot: one or two girls relaxing or playing with each other. The feel is strictly amateur: the site is an example of amateur home-style photo and video capture of two girls relaxing, playing, taking a shower, making out with each other.
Number of videos: 120.
Number of photosets: 210+
-Video updates: last video update was July 2007.
-Photoset updates: last photoset update was July 2007.
Videos only have 1 definition download option: a low-quality WMV file.
Photosets only have 1 definition zip file option: a low-quality photo.
The sex action is solo girl, or girl-girl. No boys at this site. There is very little sex action. What you get is brief nudity. Some kissing (is kissing or nudity sex action?).
The videos are short runtime, maybe 5-10 minutes.
87 MB for a 5 minute 30 second clip.
Frame width x height: 852x480.
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps.
The bitrate would support high quality video. But these are strictly amateur-style videos: poor definition, view often slightly out of focus,
no attempt at glamor-style shoot, the videos and photosets are a real home-style shoot of one or more girls just playing around.
The photosets are small, about 30-40 photos.
Individual photos are about 50-70 KB in size.
Width x height: 852x480 pixels.
The photos are more like screen caps than professionally shot photos.
Many of the photos are out of focus. The framing is poor. The photosets are a photo record of a video shoot. And the video shoot is very free-
form: the video guy just turns a video camera on one or two girls and captures whatever they happen to do. There is nudity involved, but it's a really amateur home-style shoot, in style and content.
Does the site have any value? Maybe for someone who is desperate to see one or two girls who are naked sometimes.
Reply To Review