Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Try Teens

Try Teens (0)

endlessporn (6) 04-18-11  11:05pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Updated: 04-19-11  10:02am  (Update History)
Reason: removed comments about not updating, please see discussion below this review for details
Pros: - drop-dead gorgeous teens
- most girls like sex
- good close-ups
- plenty of teen anal action
Cons: - locations are all the same
- only SD video
Bottom Line: It is a very good site for teen hardcore sex.

Site shows teens getting fucked. There is no story, and very little undressing, just fuck. The girls seem to like sex, and many are drop-dead gorgeous (8 to 10). Fuck is predictable, and anal is very frequent, but girls like it, so it is not boring.

Location is always a room, which is ok, but nothing special.

Video is very clear SD (most at 960x540, older ones at 640x480), but IMHO SD is not enough for year 2011. I have never seen any DRM.

Download speeds were ok (but not great) for me, and I have never seen any download limits.

Bonus sites are a nice addition, but I did not get access to all the sites they advertised. Sites which were provided as bonus, were ok to good, but nothing too special.

I think it is a good site, and think it was certainly worth the money.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


BadMrFrosty (56) I disagree with several of the points raised in this review. Firstly only the very old videos are SD 640x480. The newer videos (at least the last 100 or so) are 960x540 and look very nice even if the are not what is commonly called HD. Secondly the site is updated at least 2 or 3 times a month. I grant you that is not very often but it is unfair to state that the site is not updated as a negative in your review.
04-19-11  01:40am

Reply To Message


endlessporn (6) REPLY TO #1 - BadMrFrosty :

On the point of 960x540 - yes, you're right, it is my mistake (looked at properties of the wrong file), I will correct it. As it is described on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_video, Wikipedia defines HD as 1280x720 or better, so 960x540 is still SD, but it is certainly better than 640x480.

On the point of updates, I strongly suspect they're merely rotating content, and trust statement from http://www.thebestporn.com/review/tryteens/ , where TBP says "No updates in at least a couple of months".

04-19-11  02:12am

Reply To Message


BadMrFrosty (56) REPLY TO #2 - endlessporn :

I, like you, really enjoy the models on this site (well the whole network) and have been a member many times. This along with my mad facial recognition skills allow me to comment on this with certainty.

I can guarantee you that they are not rotating updates, every scene posted as new is new. They sometimes re-order the scenes but that hasn't happened in ages. TBP is defiantly wrong about the update frequency, I have seen with my own eyes quite a few new scenes added in the last couple of months.

Aside from that its a good review so keep up the good work :)

04-19-11  04:10am

Reply To Message


endlessporn (6) REPLY TO #3 - BadMrFrosty :

I am glad that you like my review, thanks :).

About updates - I do not have good memory for faces, but I will check what they have now against my several-months old archive, and if there are no matches, I will change review accordingly (and probably will try the site again some time later). Thanks for heads-up BTW, I've had a strong feeling they're just rotating stuff, like too many other sites :(.

04-19-11  05:40am

Reply To Message


endlessporn (6) REPLY TO #3 - BadMrFrosty :

I've checked my archive of the girls (founf it not as complete as I would like it to be), and indeed I didn't find new girls in my archive, so it looks that you're right and they are not rotating content, but are updating the site. Thanks for pointing it out, I will update my review accordingly and will probably try this site again some day (or maybe I should try AssTeenMouth instead, did you try it yourself?)
04-19-11  10:00am

Reply To Message


rearadmiral (388) Thanks for this review! I had never seen this site before. I'm not sure how I missed the last reviews that were done, but I'm glad i saw this one. The title page alone is enough to make me want to join this site! Knowing that I won't be ripped off seals the deal.
04-19-11  01:40pm

Reply To Message


BadMrFrosty (56) REPLY TO #5 - endlessporn :

You have shown you write decent reviews and have integrity, both good things to have on this site :)

I have tried all the sites in the teencoreclub network, assteenmouth is maybe my favourite. The girls are mostly exactly the same as tryteens but, as the name suggests, its all about anal. There are currently about 95 scenes, they are still updating at about the same rate (2 - 3 times a month). I dont think you would be disappointed if you joined but you will have the same complaints as with tryteens

04-19-11  11:45pm

Reply To Message


mbaya (366) Definitely you should try assteenmouth. I found it to be a good site, although the action is the same in every video. Nice looking models and interesting sex.
04-20-11  05:31am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.