Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Curvy Kitty

Curvy Kitty (0)

turbo3052002 (0) 03-30-11  05:01pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (3)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: love her always bareback content. she has a hot mouth that will suck a guy to heavan and back. she knows how to please a man in more ways than one. no one online is like her anywhere
Cons: only con is that i wish i can find a girlfriend like her
Bottom Line: the only bottom line i have to say is join her site and you will never want to leave, i promise you.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


badandy400 (103) If I didn't know better I would say that this is the beginning of a rerun. I am sure the PU staff will be watching this one as we have all seen the many 100s on an otherwise unheard of site.
03-30-11  06:08pm

Reply To Message


Curvy Kitty (3)
Turbo your a sweet heart and I thank you for re-trying your review but you should let it dye on this one. I know your totally new to writing reviews but it's a lot more complicated then some expect.
03-31-11  12:32am

Reply To Message


Curvy Kitty (3)
REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :

As for your comment, it is unjust. Turbo is new to reviews and doesn't have a decent idea of what or how he should be doing it. I have been here for a LONG time and so has my site. He's a sweetie as are the rest that have made reviews of my site.

I personally have not been here in year but I have been a member of TheBestPorn site for many many years. My site is not 'unknown' and far from it. It's been running now with as good as weekly (if not more) updates. You don't get a site with over 12,000 photos in 175 galleries or over 250 videos with LOTS of extras by 'not being known'.

I am the webmaster and model of my site. I have been for the almost 6yrs it's been running. I am one of the THE longest running BBW sites on the net now. I do everything that you see or experience with it from design to content to everything in between.

Turbo happens to be a long time member and a more the avid fan... perhaps a bit too avid but hey that is what you end up with when people get to know the person behind the content rather then just some webmaster.

03-31-11  12:38am

Reply To Message


badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #3 - Curvy Kitty :

Well, I have been in the porn world for a good while as well and I had not known of your site. That in itself does not speak well for your exposure.

Frequently when someone is a member of a site for several years they do not get around the porn world much and do not have much to compare to. Reviews from fanatics do not do people much good. Only one of the reviews you have comes from a known member here at PU. All the rest come from people with a single review, yours. We have seen previously when a series of unknowns submits 100's and similar score and it turns out to be shilling.

It would not be a stretch to conclude, or at lest speculate, that you asked these people to write reviews for you. We a webmaster is in contact with their members it is very easy to get to that. That makes for bias reviews because they do no want to disappoint you.

The flip side of that is that you do have contact with members which is a good thing. Having not been to your site I can not say if it is good or not.

On that note, I will not join your site because there are no trust worthy reviews, my opinion, and I feel that you are trying to manipulate the system here. We have no information about your site, types of videos, media specs, cancellation policies, or any of the important stuff many of us here look for.

In reading other comments you have wrote to other members I have noticed you try to sneak out of people compared to other sites. You ask not to be compared to professional sites, skinny site, granny sites, and so on. The simple fact of the matter is that my money is equal no matter which site I subscribe to. You ask us to ignore obviously superior sites.

Being a solo site we would not expect for you to have as much content as the huge network site. Sites do get held to different standards based off of what they are, particularly when it comes to archive size and update size. What no one mentions is the physical quality of your videos and pictures. I would expect a 100 site to produce full HD no matter the niche, as an example.

Bottom line is I do not trust you or those who have reviewed your site.

04-01-11  07:52pm

Reply To Message


Curvy Kitty (3)
REPLY TO #4 - badandy400 :

That is very much your choice to believe or not. It's hard for one to take up a majority of the first 10 pages of google search engine under an form or version of curvykity and not be known.

The member that posted, I will be honest is quite well a friend and perhaps was not fair for him to post. I have been on contact with the people that run TBP and PU... I have discussed it with them before he attempted this again for the 3rd time.... at least that I've managed to catch. They know he's real, he's been pointed out the review points page and the like.

I haven't nor will I ever have '100s' of review as I am one of the low amateur BBW solo sites. That has a LOT of difference then say a pro granny site or any skinny girl site amateur or not. I'm not a slut/gangbang type girl either that has a couple dozen different men on her site to help ether. These things make a huge different in my thoughts.

I do carry HD video but only just as of around the last mmmm 6month maybe. I also carry high res photos as well. My video archive is not top notch I admit that. I started with a pretty low end camcorder that sucked in low light, switched to a Digital Flip which was far more superior and then from there changed to a Ultra HD Digital Flip which is even more superior to it's older counter part. I can't see how you expect a 6yr old site to carry nothing but HD quality. HD equipment 6yrs ago was almost unheard of much less expecting a site such as mine to carry nothing but. Do you know how expensive HD would have been when I first started this? Remember home 100% home-grown. I started with almost nothing but a good husband, computer knowledge, a good host and a 1.3 pixel HP digital.

And if that is not enough, I have at least *2* ways for someone that wants to know more about my site in all of it's glory. 1 a mega tour (100% free) that includes video samples & photo samples as well as weekly update noticed that include a snap from the most recent video/s as well clickable full size (800x600pixel) photos each time I update with them. The tour holds at least 4weeks worth up updates to explore. Then there is the limited access trial for $3.95... it gives access to see what my site is behind the member's area.

How much harder can it be to 'trust' someone as you put it. All of my reviews were done YEARS ago with exception of Turbo's... nothin' I can do about that and that was when PU was VERY new. Things change and do people. I'm sure there will be other reviews in time... from those that have other sites to compare to that do fit my niche and that are amateur.

04-02-11  12:37am

Reply To Message


badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #5 - Curvy Kitty :

I think you missed many of my points. I was not saying 100s of reviews, I as referring to reviews with scores of 100 or close too.

Everyone says they have "high res" photos and HD video but many people do not. You say that you have been around PU for a while, you should have noticed that many of us want the actual specs. Physical resolution, bit rate, photo dimensions and so on. That is what I am looking for.

HD in the past six months is well behind par. HD has been affordable for years now. You are going to get no sympathy there. No HD five years ago is to be expected. I would not expect an amateur site to front $100,000 for an HD camera that many computers would not be able to play. Not asking to be ahead of the curve, but certainly keep up with them.

Limited trials are limited robbery. Those are 99% of the time a rip off.

Something you need to consider is that when reviewing a site you compare it to similar sites for content alone. I would not go to your site and then complain that you do not fit into a size 2 dress. That simply would not make sense. Comparing content niche to niche is good. I think you understand that part. The other part is the more of the technical aspects. Video size and quality, photo sized and quality, navigation and on and on and on are comparable globally. Your product must look as good as the best otherwise it is not the best. Score of 100 indicate a site that is the best on the net, not just a single niche. Others have more content, Videobox, many have better HD, you may very well have the best niche content but that does not account for the other aspects.

"The member that posted, I will be honest is quite well a friend and perhaps was not fair for him to post." That was my initial point and is what I wanted to hear.

04-02-11  04:47pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.