Comment Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Capn (28)
|
That copyright being stuck at 2006 is ominous.
That sounds as suspicious as another site I ran across recently which had samples of recent updates.
The watermark on the phots were dated 2005!
To answer you question, I don't know for sure, but I would put the chances around 95% that it is dead in the water.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-31-11 04:08am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
messmer (137)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Capn :
Yep, and I am 95% sure you are right, Cap'n. Just was hoping against hope that someone would prove me wrong! :-)
|
03-31-11 10:01am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|
