Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Policeman

Policeman (0)

Active
63
lk2fireone (194) 03-18-11  12:11am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Easy site log-in.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Zip file for each photoset. (The site has 2 photosets total. That is not a joke.)
-Small amount of site contents. With a fast Internet connection, you can download the entire site contents in 1 day. And then review the contents at your leisure.
-Some attractive models.
Cons: -Archive site. No updates since 2006.
-Small site.
-The site has only 2 photosets, which are a low-quality photographic record of a video shoot. Even though you can download a zip file for each
photoset, I don't know who would want to keep a zip file of these photosets.
-Site contents are not dated, except for the two photosets, which are from 2006. Apparently the last update for the site was in April, 2006.
-Most videos have only one download option, a low-quality WMV file. A few videos have a choice of download as low-quality WMV or low-quality MPEG file.
-The default option for filename of each video downloads as 001.wmv, which means you have to manually rename each file, to avoid overwriting with the next download. And also to separate the files from one another, because a bunch of files with the filename of 001.wmv are hard to distinguish from one another.
-No bio for the models. They don't even bother to name the models.
Bottom Line: CONS (continued):
-Navigation is basic. You get a list of the videos, in apparent chronological order (but no date is listed). That's it.
-No search feature.

BOTTOM LINE:
Site contents:

This is a small archive site that has not been updated since 2006. It has 25 videos, and 2 photosets.
The 2 photosets are a photographic record of 2 video shoots. The photosets are poor quality photographs, more like screen captures (or maybe they are screen captures).

videos: 25
Sample video file size: about 250 MB, for a runtime of 34 minutes.
Total bitrate: 1017kbps (very low bitrate, indicating poor quality of video).
Frame width x height: 400x300.

photosets: 2
photoset 1 has 115 photos.
photoset 2 has 100 photos.
Individual photos have a file size of about 60-80 KB, 1024x576 pixels.

This site is supposed to be a reality porn series. The site theme is 2 cops who play practical jokes on women who are applying for a driver's license. The two cops, one who is dressed as a doctor, make the women applicants undress and then have sex as part of the medical exam. This is a very stupid idea, and the two "cops" are sort of acting like an updated
version of the three stooges. But the women go along with the idea, and have sex with the two cops: bj, vaginal, maybe anal, whatever. At the end, because the women had sex with the two guys, the women are told they passed their medical exam needed for a driver's license.

One model asks: What does a gynecological exam have to do with a driver's license?
The cop dressed as a doctor answers: We have to make sure you don't wiggle around on the seat when driving.

(There are subtitles, because the models are speaking whatever European language they use.)

Some of the models are attractive. I wish the quality of the videos was better. The camera-work is ok to good, the lighting is ok to good (these
are indoor scenes shot in a small room), but the definition/clarity of the videos could be greatly improved.

This is part of the Diesel network. If you joined this site by itself, you would feel that not only the models were getting screwed, but that you had been screwed as well.

But if you get this site as part of the Diesel network, then the site is worth glancing over. Many of the models are cute. I only wish the videos were better quality (higher definition, mainly).

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

slutty (109) Can't disagree with your review, I totally agree it isn't much of a site and totally worthless as a standalone, although I will say that I do really enjoy a few of their scenes, the sonia red scene they have here is for some reason my favorite scene of her. Although curiously they have merged a good portion of this material with their other sites, so not sure why they even bother keeping it.

I'm always curious how accurate the subtitles are...

03-18-11  08:49pm

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #1 - slutty :

If the quality of the videos was upgraded to high resolution, I think at least some of the videos would be worth keeping, because there are some very attractive models in these videos.

There is one model in particular that I really like. I've seen her in a very few videos at different sites. And she's in one video at this site. If the definition was only better, it would be a nice video, because I find her very attractive. I don't know her name.

But the chance of this network upgrading these videos is close to zero.

Regarding subtitles: I think for most porn sites that have subtitles for their videos (mainly Russian or Eastern Europe), most of what the models say in these clips where the model and stunt cock are "acting", the conversations and subtitles are far below the standards of even a grade B movie. I enjoyed the idea of reading subtitles in a porn clip, but after reading the subtitles of a few clips, most of what was said was either stupid or boring or almost meaningless, and I did not worry about the accuracy of the translations.

Check the subtitled videos at the Teen Mega World network to see what I mean. Tricky masseur has a lot of subtitled videos. Or this Policeman site has subtitles, which helps to explain the words the models are using. But after reading the subtitles, you can turn your brain off and try to enjoy the sex action, because the conversational part has little to hold your interest.

There are softcore films where the conversation can add interest and humor and flavor to the video/movie. But not the sex porn clips found at networks like Teen Mega World, Devils Film, or Diesel or Nubiles.

03-18-11  10:56pm

Reply To Message

3

james4096 (126) Ran out of room for cons. Is that a first?
03-19-11  08:26pm

Reply To Message

4

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #3 - james4096 :

I used to go over my limit for cons much more often. I tend to ramble and use a lot of words where other people are more succinct. I've given up trying to write really nice reviews. Though I do appreciate reading good reviews from others.
03-19-11  10:04pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.