Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Double Teamed Teens

Double Teamed Teens (0)

Active
84
Jay G (65) 03-16-11  12:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. For those who enjoy 2 on 1 (anal and vag DP), there is well-lit, good photography and high quality videos. The girls often are often looking straight at YOU, the viewer, with their beautiful eyes as they receive of attention of two studs who, wonderfully don't talk or make lots of noises to distract from the women.

2. Many very attractive young women, mostly 18 to 25.

3. Additional bonus sites like Ass Teen Mouth are a great value.
Cons: If you expect to log in to the site and enjoy the great material, you may get quite frustrated as the password system is sometimes-working, sometimes not. There have been hours when I couldn't log-in, and then suddenly could. For bonus sites you must log-in, click a bonus site, and then log-in again, hoping every time that it will work this time.

Then, just when you think you've arrived, the system may suddenly, after just a minute or two, toss you out and force you to begin the whole process over again. Then again, sometimes it will work for a long time without problems.

Frustrating? Yes. Worth the frustration? Sometimes.

The quality of the great pictures and videos keeps me going, sometimes I just give up for a few hours then try again.
Bottom Line: 1. Many pretty young women in intense double penetration scenes.

2, Now includes several excellent bonus sites, but accessing them is sometimes a troublesome issue.

3. At the end of each photo set in the members area is a large thumbnail from other sites the same model has worked on, so you can get more of a model you really like.

4. The password needs to be re-entered as you move to each bonus site (along with annoying random symbols like "aX2y4"). There are times when you are made to re-enter the password every few minutes even at the same site and there was a time where the password didn't work at all for several hours.

5. In the photos the big beautiful eyes of the girls are looking at YOU, the viewer. The well-lit and excellently photographed scenes of double penetration are of superior quality.

With the bonus sites this has become a bargain, and is one of the best deep throat and anal sites I've ever seen. If they can ever settle the technical password issues this would be near perfect.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) Great review. But no matter how good the site contents, I could not put up with the password issues. You must have a ton of patience to deal with that.
03-16-11  08:54am

Reply To Message

2

whowho (7) I wouldn't consider the quality of videos "great", when there is no HD available (even though they claim so, it's not). This site and the whole network is outdated in technical terms.
03-16-11  01:25pm

Reply To Message

3

rearadmiral (322) I've not seen this network before so I looked at it after reading your review. It has a lot of teen and anal themed sites (and some teen anal theme sites) so I'm definitely interested, but I don't think I could do it based on the concerns that you report.

Thanks for the review.

03-16-11  05:53pm

Reply To Message

4

Jay G (65) REPLY TO #2 - whowho :

We'll have to agree to disagree about the quality of the videos. I'm no techie, so I can't tell you if it's actual HD or not, but the pictures seem crisp and clear on my laptop screen and the lighting makes them much better than most of the dark or fuzzy videos I still see on many sites. I've belonged to over a hundred sites over the years and haven't seen much better quality pictures anywhere.
03-17-11  06:14am

Reply To Message

5

Jay G (65) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

You know, in the first five days I was so frustrated I quit the site and was ready to call CCBill and demand my money back. Then it worked (sort of). So I put up with the password issues and still do.

Next time I join a Kink.com site I'll appreciate more than ever their quality service where you almost never have to re-enter your password for days even.

By the way, they offered me a special deal (like $14.95/mo USD) when I was quitting, but I didn't take it because I couldn't even get into the sites on that day.

03-17-11  06:19am

Reply To Message

6

mbaya (356) Are all the videos anal and vaginal? Is there much variety, such as oral or multiple guys?
03-18-11  06:02am

Reply To Message

7

Jay G (65) REPLY TO #6 - mbaya :

Yes, all seem to include oral, anal & vaginal. The oral is less intense than in Ass Teen Mouth or Young Throats. Every scene seems to include the girl "sandwich" along with other permutations and combinations.

Pretty formulaic, not much variety, and it seems to be the same two guys sharing the 66 pretty girls, one at a time. Pure hardcore without a story to fast-forward through. Gets boring, but after a pause I find myself coming back for more because I like the girls and the serious sex.

03-18-11  10:41am

Reply To Message

8

BadMrFrosty (56) REPLY TO #4 - Jay G :

Technically the videos are not HD, usually HD has a resolution of 1280x720 or 1080x1920. The videos on this network are 960x540 which sits in between DVD resolution (720x480) and HD.

That aside, I do agree they look VERY nice even when viewed full screen on my TV. They have done a great job with the encoding which is much more important than the resolution of the video. While it would be nice to see then offer true HD video, that paired with their encoding prowess could produce some truly beautiful results, I find no reason to criticize the video quality. Especially when there are plenty of other real problems with this network of sites that should be solved before upgrading the video quality.

03-21-11  02:11am

Reply To Message

9

Jay G (65) REPLY TO #8 - BadMrFrosty :

Thanks for the info!
03-21-11  07:43am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.