Young Legal Porn (7)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-DRM: none.
-Site timeout: Very long period before timeout.
-Download limits: None.
-Model listing is name of model with a nice-sized thumbnail and a listing of her photosets and videos.
-Many of the newer videos are nice quality: clear video, good focus, good lighting, good sex action, very attractive models,
great skin tone, good color of background and foreground, good sound control.
-Most videos have a choice of 3 download qualities to choose from: low, medium or high quality. |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is basic. For a relatively small site, the navigation could be
easily improved to make moving around and finding the photosets/videos of each model faster and simpler.
-Search is limited. You can search by model's name, but for little else.
-They should junk the software system they use to view individual photos.
-No model bios or other information on the models.
-Many of the older videos are very poor quality in terms of clarity, lighting, colors, annoying background music.
-The content is posting dated, but the significance of the date can be low.
Some material was made years before it was posted at this site.
-The free live webcam chats with models are a waste of time. The models basically do nothing
on-screen except wait for someone to pay for a private chat. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats:
-Number of models: 303+
-Number of videos: 1,000+ (No easy way to estimate number)
-Number of photosets: 1,000+ (No easy way to estimate number)
The newer videos are mainly good quality: good lighting, good colors (skin tone, background, foreground), ok to good camera work.
video stats (newer videos):
frame width x height: 1280 x 720
total bitrate: 8572 kbps - 15459 kbps
frame rate: 29 frames/second
photo stats:
photosets: 30-100 photos.
file size: 200-400 Kb (newer photo size).
width x height: 2250 x 1500 pixels.
resolution: horizontal x vertical: 96 dpi x 96 dpi.
Photosets can have from 30 to 100 photos. The file size of an individual photo can be large, up to 400+ Kb, but the photos are not high quality in terms of appeal or photographic technique.
The photosets are more in the style of an amateur-shot photo series done at home, except that I have seen many amateur photos that have much better photo technique than the photosets at this site.
The two primary sites in the dieselaccess network that have the most value are YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls. There are some other sites in the
network that are also worthwhile, but the most value is in those two sites.
YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls are very similar sites: same type of content, same layout, same models, etc. And it appears that some content is shared between the two sites.
YoungLegalPorn takes a softcore approach to porn. By this, I mean that the sex is gentle, not rough or abusive. The sex is caring, affectionate, or friendly, with no slapping, spitting, hitting, name-calling, etc. The sex can be hardcore in the sense there is female masturbation, lesbian activity, boy-girl sex.
I appreciate the overall quality of many videos at this site. But some PU members might think the site is too tame, and would rather watch a harder, edgier type of sex that is featured at many hardcore sites.
The free Diesel cam shows are not shows, but a waste of time where the model does almost nothing except sit or lie on a bed, waiting for someone
to pay for a private show. There is also a mode where the "public free show" turns into a show which is still "public", but you have to pay 1 euro per minute to watch. Supposedly there is some stripping or other action in the non-free public show. The private chats are 3 euros per
minute. So it could get very expensive to watch.
It would probably be cheaper to go to a topless bar to see some stripping, instead of watching it over the internet.
Note: hugow wrote a review of this site on 2011-01-02 and gave it a 50 score because he said the servers were very slow. Most of the files I downloaded from this site (and the other sites in this network) had speeds of 620-630 KB/s, which is my maximum download speed. So I did not experience the poor download speeds hugow reported.
(I recently upgraded my DSL connection, which used to have a maximum download speed of 150-160 KB/s.) |
Reply To Review |
