Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Pure CFNM

Pure CFNM (0)

FZKK (1) 02-01-11  05:51am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: download speeds seem reasonable, but certainly not fast.
Cons: generally speaking, un-attractive women.
little creativity in the scenes overall.
some ugly (almost) overweight men.
most of these women have no idea how to give a (good) handjob.
generally speaking women are not wearing lingerie
or any sort of sexy clothing(ins't that sort of the point with CFNM?)
Bottom Line: VERY disapointing. there were a handfull of scenes
that i thought really had potential, but they turned out to be quite vanilla overall.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


PureCFNM (1)
It's a shame that our competitors feel the need to pretend to be reviewers and write stuff like this. Just look at our home page and you will see the girls aren't ugly but are actually very attractive. And it is clearly YOU who doesn't understand CFNM because this niche has NOTHING to do with lingerie or sexy clothing.
PureCFNM is STILL, after nearly 6 years, the market leader in CFNM - because we, unlike this FZKK imposter, understand the niche and what CFNM fans want. We then give it to them - realistic scenes, featuring real life amateur guys and groups of gorgeous girls - we also have BY FAR the most scenes of any CFNM site on the internet.

02-01-11  06:46am

Reply To Message


FZKK (1) REPLY TO #1 - PureCFNM :

perhaps my critic at some point in the future will have the courage to indentify themself. beauty is in the eye of the be-holder sir, thought i should remind you of that. as well i never once offered any absolutes
as it pertains to the content, just opinions. perhaps researching
the definition of the word 'opinion' is in order. your comment is interesting about the defintion, relatively speaking, of CFNM.
perhaps i should educate myself on that. but in closing i will just
say: it's porn sir, relax.

02-01-11  07:02am

Reply To Message


Monahan (42) CFNM=Clothed Female Nude Male

I did what the webmaster suggested and found the preview site to have some real babes. I'm not into that genre, but a specialty site that lasts for 6 years obviously is doing a good job satisfying its market niche.

02-01-11  08:19am

Reply To Message


Jay G (67) REPLY TO #1 - PureCFNM :

One thing I find as a daily reader of this site is that porn users have a great variety of opinions, many of them strongly held.

In this case, I think your girls are good-looking and more than fuck-able and I actually prefer girls fucking guys who aren't young and hunk-y. Seeing someone not so good looking fucking a pretty babe turns me on. I actually don't like guys being too macho good looking, but that's just me.

Your niche site looks good and I wish you the best of luck.

02-01-11  09:17am

Reply To Message


FZKK (1) REPLY TO #3 - Monahan :

it's clear even users of TBP forget that TBP is an opinion based website. i commend CFNM for running a successfull website for many years.
02-01-11  12:45pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.