Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Nylon X Files

Nylon X Files (0)

Active
75
otoh (54) 01-31-11  12:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 02-19-11  12:06am  (Update History)
Reason: Download links now provided to pictures - see my edit notes.
Pros: - Good photography
- Fairly unique content
- Pretty models
- Nice outfits and (obviously) great nylons
- Some good mild-fetish wear
- Many location/outdoor shoots
- Some entertaining videos
- Downloading pictures was a mildly diverting intellectual challenge
Cons: - Arguably not much actual nudity (depends on your definition)
- Max resolution of 1200x800px; videos at 320x640
- Frequent timeouts of login
- Only one connection allowed - eg can't open a gallery while viewing a video
- No zip sets
- No video download
- No model index
- No update schedule, or dating of sets
Bottom Line: I recently saw some pictures from Pantyhose-X - a German nylon fetish magazine (unsure whether print or only online). The few sets that I saw, I loved, and decided to seek out and join the source. I'm not sure of the details, but reading between the lines, I suspect that some change of ownership has been involved recently; pantyhose-x.com becoming nylon-x-files.com with content from the former. I also rather suspect that the changes are not for the best.

First the good.

This is obviously very nylon-oriented material - and more to the point, it's very fetishistic. By which I mean that it focuses very much on the sheerness of it; in fact in the majority of the sets, the tights don't come off at all. Some of them are gusseted and you don't see that much, other than them pulled up tight into the model's pussy; others are seamless and sheer and there are plenty of closeups of the girls masturbating through and under the nylon. The rest of the clothing is great too - from casual and businesswear, to things like corsets, high lace-up boots, PVC miniskirts etc.

The models too are pretty - not too glam or polished (maybe some peroxide), some girl-next-door types - but great figures and legs (of course!). And the photography is great - with a lot of shoots outdoors and in public places - some quite risqué stuff which is kind of exciting.

My only gripe with the content is my usual - most models are shaved, and given the nature of this style, that you get to glimpse them through the sheer nylon, I can't help feeling that even a trimmed strip or patch of hair would be something more to glimpse.

However...

Although I love the material, the presentation of it is the worst I've come across. Having emailed the webmaster to check, I knew about the resolution (it seems to have suffered in the transition, from the 1800px sets that seem to have been offered by pantyhose-x) and the lack of zips - but figured I'd give it a try.

The members area is very basic, just a list of sets with no dating, model names, or sorting/searching features for the 150 odd sets available.

**Edit** When I first wrote the review, there was no download of anything - not even individual pictures - you could only view on screen in a lightbox-type viewer, which made me mark it down heavily. But the site does now offer download links to pictures; there are still no zips, but this small change makes it easy to download a set with a manager, eg downThemAll.

The site still has issues as in the cons above, but this small change makes it seem far less mean-spirited, and is enough to bump my score from 65 to 75 - it's now recommended if you like this material (and can use a download manager!)

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Capn (28) A very nice review,otoh.

It seems you have here a decent niche site starting on the slide.
A shame.

Oh, there really shouldn't be any doubt on the definition of nudity.
I even did a thread on it a while back onthe forum IIRC.
Nudity means no clothes. Simple.
Clothes pulled aside is flashing.
Partially clothed is partially clothed, regardless of whether naughty bits are on view. ;0)

Cap'n. :0)

01-31-11  03:09am

Reply To Message

2

otoh (54) REPLY TO #1 - Capn :

Thanks, Cap'n :)

On the definitions - I see your point, although I'd consider partially clothed very different depending on whether or not the naughty bits are seen! I'm much more a fan of some clothing, even if minimal (ideally very minimal) rather than absolutely nude.

However, I was more trying to differentiate between flashing/partially clothed, and the 'Non-nude' category of sites we see on TBP/PU - which I'd find a little frustrating :|

01-31-11  05:38am

Reply To Message

3

Capn (28) REPLY TO #2 - otoh :

Yes, this is a long term gripe I have had.

See the Striptease thread & also here:

http://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_thr...d.html?threadid=1382

Cap'n. :0)

01-31-11  06:10am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.