Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Club Sapphic

Club Sapphic (0)

Active
70
Goldfish (67) 01-26-11  07:20pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (45), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + A storyline is incorporated into the scenes that is easy to buy into and sexy.
+ Decent video quality: 720 x 408/4mbps
+ TBP discount
+ Some great regular models that appear in scenes with varying themes.
Cons: - Somewhat misleading depiction of the content from the non-member Home page and tour pages
- Older video content of poorer quality.
- Some of the models looking a little ragged.
Bottom Line: This is my second time back to Club Sapphic. My previous subscription was about ten months ago. At the time I gave them a fairly positive review. Unfortunately my return to the site hasnít been as positive.

The biggest issue I have is a change in the content provided. The site is sold as a general lesbian site with young, attractive models. When I joined previously there was some variation in the model body types -- some were more amateur looking with a few imperfections, some were more modelesque, some were older, some were younger, etc. but generally there seemed to be no theme around bodytype or age.

When I returned to the site recently there appeared to be A LOT of MILF type models in younger/older scenarios. Also, there was generally more women with tattoos and bad boobs jobs (of any age).

With the decision to take the site in the MILF/younger-older direction, They should really consider re-branding the site. I still found some good clips but overall it was a disappointment because it isn't my favorite niche.

I was also a little annoyed because the splash page when you first visit the site displays all younger, pretty models with no mention or reference to the large amount of MILF content coming out in recent updates. (About three pages into the tour you start seeing some screen shots of more recent videos.)

Doing a younger/older site is fine, just sell it that way!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

messmer (137) LOL. And you recommended this site to me? I could happily live with the older/younger theme .. but an abundance of tattoos and botched boob jobs? Never shall my money end up in their hands! :-)
02-04-11  07:09pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.