Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit The Sperm Lover

The Sperm Lover (0)

Active
50
lk2fireone (194) 01-11-11  01:00pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Easy login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Zip file for photosets.
-No download limits.
-No watermark on the videos.
-Videos are short runtime, often split into 5-minute clips.
Cons: -Archive site. Last update January 2007.
-Quality and feel of individual photos is amateur. More like a home-shot photo than a professionally shot photo. Nothing approaching the photo quality available at a glamor site like Metart or MPL Studios.
-Medium sized, obtrusive watermark on photos. Only a true fan of site model would want to keep any of these photos. Or someone who wants a very
complete collection of any of the models that might be a visitor shown in the photos.
-OK to low resolution on the videos, which are shot like amateur videos.
-No search engine.
-Very basic navigation.
Bottom Line: -This is a small, solo-model type site. A waste of time and effort. If they had kept the site alive with updates and improved the video and photo quality, the site might have had some value, but it's hard to see any value in this site.
Anyone paying a site membership fee for access to this solo site will probably kick himself for stupidity or carelessness.
-This site is basically a waste of time and hard drive space. I didn't save a single video or photo from this site.

Small site.
Videos: 47
Photosets: 73
Short runtime: Videos run 10-20 minutes, often split into 2 clips.
Frame width x height: 852x480
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps

With that high a bitrate, you would expect much higher definition video and sharp focus. But the camera-man does not take advantage of the large data-size of the file: the focus is not sharp and clear and is not often centered/framed on the action. The lighting is not sharp and crisp.

The site is designed as a solo-model site of a girl who has friends (male and female). The sex action is spread around: The main girl masturbates, has sex with 1 or 2 boys, has sex with some of her female friends. The female friends have male-female sex and female-female sex.

-If you get access to the site through the network, you can glance through the site contents (videos, photos). But it's doubtful you will find
anything of interest. Unless you happen to be a true collector of a few of the models that visit the site briefly (such as Dasha or Lay the Cat). But the visiting models are not clearly identified in each set they appear in, so you have to study many of the sets to guess the identity/name of some of the models in some of the videos and photosets.
The number of visiting models at this site is very small, less than 10. Few of the visiting models are well known.
None of the photos or videos are worth keeping. This site is of slight to no interest. A true collector of some of the visiting models might want to have some photos and videos where their most favorite models appear, but no one else would be interested, except to see an example of the low quality that porn sites have tried to sell online to members.
The site is like a an amateur, home shot photoset and videolog of some amateur girls who are playing at sex. It appears they are having fun at times, and really enjoying the sex as well. If you are a true fan of the girls/models, that would add some interest to viewing the photos/videos. But otherwise, the site is boring.
Very basic navigation. Files are divided into two groups: photosets and videos. The files in each group are listed in descending chronological order, most recent listed first.
A nice-sized thumbnail shows you who the model(s) in the photoset/video are. Many of the models are not specifically listed for many of the photosets and videos.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (13)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

BadMrFrosty (56) Wow, you were REALLY stretching for pros on this one :)
01-11-11  01:32pm

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #1 - BadMrFrosty :

As I understand it, the PU system really dings you for a one-sided review if you don't list pros.
My score of 50 shows what I thought of the site. I would have given a lower score, but 50 is the lowest score in the PU system.
So I tried listing pros.
But almost no one would join this site and think it was worth anything.
And stretching is good for you. I really need the exercise (physically and mentally). Lol.

01-11-11  02:30pm

Reply To Message

3

BadMrFrosty (56) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

Was in no way meant as a criticism, I just thought if the only pros the site has going for it are the ones you listed it must be god awful :)
01-11-11  02:35pm

Reply To Message

4

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #3 - BadMrFrosty :

Communicating on the Internet, and in person, often leaves out a lot of meaning.
I did not feel criticized by your post. I thought it was a sensible, honest observation, a little bit of wit.
My reply was intended as a simple explanation of my review reasoning, with no wit.
Your comment was more interesting reading than my reply. :)

01-11-11  03:17pm

Reply To Message

5

slutty (109) REPLY TO #4 - lk2fireone :

I actually did keep a couple of sets from this place the last time I was a member, but I totally agree this site is sort of a worthless throw-in with all the other Deisel stuff.
01-11-11  10:37pm

Reply To Message

6

Denner (233) Thanks for the warning in a fine review...
The Diesel Media co. is certainly not at my list of favorites.

But one site from the Co. used to be just ok: 18 Only Girls. (have not been there for a long time).
Anybody been there lately? - the preview is now much better - but....?

01-12-11  06:43am

Reply To Message

7

BadMrFrosty (56) REPLY TO #4 - lk2fireone :

Agree 100%

Reminds me of the old Simpsons episode where Homer is writing a letter to Mr Burns. "Dear Mr. Burns... I'm so glad you enjoyed my son's blood and your card was just great. In case you can't tell, I'm being sarcastic."

God I havent watched that show in 5 years, must catch up.

01-12-11  08:39am

Reply To Message

8

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #6 - Denner :

I have a current membership in the Diesel network. That gives me access to all 14 sites in the network.

I think the 3 best sites in the network, that have the most value are:
18 Only Girls
Young Legal Porn
Beata Porn

18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn are very similar sites that seem to trade material between the two sites, and still update.

Beata Porn is one of the other sites in the network that is still updating, and has an attractive model. Beata is not gorgeous or lovely, but she's a nice-looking model with a very nice body.

Denner,even if you haven't been a member of 18 Only Girls for over a year, I think if you rejoined the site, you would feel disappointed with the content because you would have seen most of it before, and the new material, while nice, would not justify the membership price. That's just my opinion.

The network has a slow update rate. (Most sites in the network don't update.)

There are some attractive girls in the network, but some of those attractive girls are from the "archived" content, material that was done years ago. And the amount of content on many of those attractive models is very limited regarding photosets and videos.

The Diesel network is definitely not a scam or a cheat. But for the money, once you have seen the contents, they just don't come up with enough new content to justify rejoining for a very long time. Much more than a year, because of the slow update rate. If they had the massive update rate of Nubiles or Teen Mega World, then a return membership to Diesel through 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn would make sense, depending on your tastes. Because the Diesel network has more limited audience than Nubiles or Teen Mega World, in my opinion.

But even if you like the material at Diesel, which I assume you did, you've already probably seen most of it. And you won't feel happy paying for a new membership based on the new content you will find.

The problem is not with the quality of the content: I think the quality of the new content is fine or acceptable. The problem is with the amount of the new content.

I think I deserve a special star for giving such a long, winding answer to such as short question.

Maybe it should be named: the Star for Being Unable To Simply Answer A Simple Question.

01-12-11  05:32pm

Reply To Message

9

Denner (233) REPLY TO #8 - lk2fireone :

You deserve a giant gold star - all PUs interested in teen model sites can benefit from this!
Thanks

01-13-11  12:42am

Reply To Message

10

slutty (109) REPLY TO #8 - lk2fireone :

hey man, I think the update schedule of this network is actually pretty decent, they typically did 4 sets a day across the network while I was a member. Nubiles does something like 3 a day, and Teen Megaworld was pretty erratic the last time I was there, I don't recall there being more the 5 or so updates a week.

granted many of the updates here are for beata or sasha blonde, and they have a bunch of dead sites, but I just thought I'd point this out.

also it seems as though lately they were putting content exclusively on either 18only or younglegal, probably in an attempt to get people to join the network rather than joining a single site. I still can't stand this aspect of the site, especially because if you join a single site they constantly seem to be trying to get you to upgrade to the network - at a higher price than if you had joined the network outright from the beginning.

I also think Deisel is targetting the same audience as Nubiles, although Nubiles does it better.

as I said in a review I did, I think think the policeman.net site is pretty amusing, although it is also dead.

01-13-11  11:06pm

Reply To Message

11

lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #10 - slutty :

My impression is that Nubiles provides a much broader range of content than Diesel. Regarding type of sex action shown, degree of explicitness, etc. Diesel seems much more focused on lesbian and masturbation, with very little boy-girl.

I will look again at the update rate of the Diesel network. I didn't actually study it closely, I was giving my impression of what I found. So I could be off in my impression.

01-13-11  11:23pm

Reply To Message

12

slutty (109) REPLY TO #11 - lk2fireone :

I see what you are saying, but comparing the two update schedules I would say they are pretty comparable, Nubiles only does 1 hardcore update a week. I defnitely agree that Deisel is more focused on girl-girl than Nubiles, and it seemed to me that Nubiles has a lot more toy use in the solo scenes where Deisel solo scenes are frequently just posing, but I think the hardcore updates are pretty equivalent.
01-13-11  11:30pm

Reply To Message

13

dieselman (35)
Webmaster
Hello lk2fireone!

Thank you for this review but this site is non active and it is quite old. It happened to a few solo sites of us, girl stop working and this site is up mainly for new members, who haven't seen our content before.

I think we are going to close the tour pages of this site soon.

10-25-11  02:57pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.