Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls (0)

Active
86
slutty (111) 12-08-10  10:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -attractive, mostly euro ladies
-good variety of content, ranging from very softcore to group
-reasonable update schedule usually 1 photo or video set per day
-good navigation, search, tags, model index, ratings
-custom zip downloads of photosets
-no DRM
-download managers work
-no apparent download limit
-largely original content, the newer stuff appears entirely original
-decent sized site, 308 models at the time of this review
-video quality decent, downloadable in 3 sizes for the newer videos HD wmv, high mp4, and low mp4. I usually just downloaded the high mp4 which is typically 640x360 3700 kbps and reasonably crisp.
-photo quality is good, newer photos are 4032x6048 and reasonably well photographed
Cons: -not a fan of accessing through the deisel access site
-no bonus content unless you pay extra
-if you pay extra for the bonus content, there is a lot of duplicate scenes across the network
-some of the paid bonus sites are no longer updating
-site can load sort of slow at times, even though download speeds were always better than 1 MB/sec
-since some of the material appears to be self produced by the talent, the video and photo camerawork can get a bit iffy at times
Bottom Line: Overall I think this site is pretty decent, my only hesitation with the site is whether or not it is worth the extra $10 to join the network.

Given that Policeman.net, Kamilla18.com, thespermlover.com, sashafucksdasha.com, and laythekat.com all appear to be no longer updating, it is probably not worth joining the network if you have been a member of it before. However, if you haven't it is probably worth considering spending the extra $10. While there is duplicate content all over the network, there are some unique scenes to each site, especially on the individual model sites.

Bottom line, I like the variety of the site, and that generally the photography is pretty good, especially with the softcore material. It would be nice if they could get some of the models to do more work in the studio with professional photographers, especially with the hardcore material. They could also do some work to fix some of their website load issues. Even with the sites drawbacks, I still think it is worth joining for a month if you are into attractive young ladies.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

tangub (151) Nice review thanks. I remember being at some of the deisel sites a few years back but i don't remember getting 18 Only Girls. I joined mainly for the Kamilla18 site. Whilst she is super cute i found the site quite poor, sub standard photography and boring videos, and very little else to interest me in the network.
12-09-10  05:00am

Reply To Message

2

Denner (233) Fine review, slutty.

That said - the site must have taken a much better turn lately - I was there in January (this year) - and certainly not happy with it - see my review. Is it still some kind of clone of YoungPorn.net?
Anyway - according to the preview - almost all the archived material is still the same - also at YP - which generally has some low tech quality material....

12-09-10  05:42am

Reply To Message

3

lk2fireone (194) I read Denner's review of this site, he gave it a low score of 69, and I decided to stay away. Now I read your review and you give the site a very positive rating.

I'm seriously thinking of joining this site because of your review. If I do join, and find that I don't like the site after all, I'm coming after you for a refund.

[Icon/symbol/glyph of enraged man screaming and waving his sword wildly before he cuts off opponent's head]

12-09-10  07:18am

Reply To Message

4

slutty (111) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :

To each their own, I suppose. I also read Denner's review, and I agree with many of his cons for the site, browsing photos on the site is a nuisance, although I usually just check a couple and download the zip if it looks good so this didn't bother me. This site and Youngporn.net share a lot of the same content, especially with older material, however newer updates appear to be released seperately on each site. I am not sure why they don't just merge the two given the large amount of overlap.

I think most of their newer content has been good to me, I hope you like it if you join, I don't need any more enemies!

12-09-10  01:03pm

Reply To Message

5

slutty (111) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

Hey Denner,

It isn't really a clone anymore they release material on the two sites seperately now - although the older material is pretty commonly shared. The videos I dowloaded all seemed fine to me, the camerawork can be a bit poor - given the self-shot nature of some of the shoots, but this didn't really bother me that much The mid-mp4 was plenty crisp for me.

I went all the way back to their 2007 releases, and they have both low and high h.264 videos (mp4). I'm pretty sure they had these when I was a member here last time...

I agree the login is fucking irritating, but they email you a link now that fills out all the security info for you except the captcha.

I can understand the frustration of joining a site and finding a lot of duplicate material from another site, I haven't seen any of that lately, but maybe its just new to me.

I'm not sure about your complaint on variety, there are 300 models on this site. Given they are all young, and euro, so there isn't a lot of variety in ethnicity or age. But I think it is a reasonable variety of models that is consistent with most euro sites.

Everyone has their own tastes I suppose, I think the material is pretty good here and I don't feel as though I wasted my money. I guess maybe I go against the grain sometimes, I for one can't understand why people like 21sextury so much, that place just pisses me off for some reason.

12-09-10  01:26pm

Reply To Message

6

elephant (65) It also been a while since I was last here and I'm glad to here of the site not just being a clone anymore so much and having its own material. I'm very tempted to be joining again. I wish you could get a reduced rate for joinging this and younglegalporn together, sounds like all the other sites apart from beataporn I will have as they haven't updated in ages. I joined originally for Lay the Kat and I found her site above average cause she was so very cute, she is worth the join for me if you haven't got anything by her before, without her tats she'd be in my top 5 girls.

I've seen a couple of previews of this site and younglegalporn and must say they are getting now some of my favs onboards, Summer Breeze and Tiffany have recently made appearances which is great news, hope to see more of them there. Hope they keep adding more cuties.

My only thing is that is putting me off joining again is the photos, as I'm just not into photos anymore and it looks like from the previews that a lot of cute girls are photo sets.

Good review though and thanks for the info.

12-10-10  06:35am

Reply To Message

7

slutty (111) REPLY TO #6 - elephant :

you are right that recently a lot of the more attractive newer girls are only doing photosets. But, hopefully that will change.

the sites that are still updating are:
younglegalporn
18onlygirls
alicewonderbang
natashashy
vikanymph
beataporn
sashablonde
ivanafukalot

12-10-10  09:43am

Reply To Message

8

elephant (65) REPLY TO #7 - slutty :

Cheers for the info slutty, yeah not too bothered about some of the solo models sites apart from Beata and I used to like Vika but not as much these days, I would mainly be joining for the main sites. Cheers anyway good to know they do update some of the sites.
12-11-10  03:06pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.