Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Young Busty

Young Busty (0)

Active
85
badandy400 (103) 12-01-10  08:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -The breasts are NATURAL!
-Price not bad, although in euros so it changes for us on this side of the lake
-Can search by model
-Still updating frequently
-Finally has zips for pictures
-Several download options for videos
-Speed is okay, but not great
-Navigation fairly easy
-Picture pass word very easy to read
-Can download multiple files at once
-Video file names are okay, at least have model name included
-Can but sets into a "favorites" section
-Variety in scenes, solo, bg, gg
Cons: -Log in every hour or so
-Need picture password, these annoy me
-Absolutely no download resuming
-Picture zip file has horrible naming, all are "bonus" so need manual renaming
-Most lesbian scenes very short
-Not all photo sets have zips, seemingly no logic to which do and do not
-Not HD, a little behind par on quality of media
Bottom Line: Young Busty does well to live up to its name. Most of the girls are young and their certainly are some very busty ones. The trick is that they are mostly not over weight. Best of all, the breasts are natural! You will find girls that are attractive here other than in breast size.

This was the second time I joined the site and found it to overall be the same way it was a few years ago. They have been updating the whole time. I was very pleased to find they had added zip files for the pictures sets, even to sets that existed before the zips were introduced.

The three most significant complaints about the site is the lack of media quality, no download resume, and the extremely frequent log in. You have to log in every hour or so and when you do it takes you to the page you intended on navigating to, but if you push "back" to get to the model index or whatever it takes you back to the log in screen. You have to re-navigate to where you were initially.

Secondly, the no resume on downloads is terrible. I had to download the same file on so many occasions and often more than once. My internet has be bad lately so I got hit with this harder than most. I can typically find a way to resume, but was not able to here.

Finally, and most importantly, the video quality was not what it should be. Newer videos are not bad, but slightly older stuff is very notable. Newer videos are 5 MBit/s, a few at 6, at 1280x720 which sounds good, but somehow it just does not look as crisp as one might expect. As the videos get older the quality drops in increments down to 640x480 at 2 MBit/s.

Pictures are not huge but not small. 2000x1331 and 1600x106 are common sizes for the larger files, which are also found in the zip files. While the dimensions are not as large as on many sites they still look crisp.

Quicky Rundown
383 Videos
125 GB of videos
Videos up to 6 MBit at 1280x720
Video size range from 36 MB to 1.4 GB
2-40 minutes in duration

Would I recommend this site?

Yes I would. If you have a thing for naturally busty teens and young 20's this site should be on the top of your list. The girls look good and most have D's or larger. The site does require some patience to download but it worth the trouble. I have been there twice and will definitely return in the future to see what updates they have.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

tangub (151) Thanks for a fine review. I'm quite interested in this site but the lack of photo zips has always put me off before. Any idea what percentage of the photos is zipped now roughly?....thanks.
12-02-10  12:29am

Reply To Message

2

Denner (233) Thanks for a fine update in review for this site, badandy...
It seems like it's been around forever - or rather a long time.
And it seems like the quality is getting better compared to early 2009/late 2008 - back then the main cons was the quality of both vids and pix.
Guess from this review where bandandy states:
"-Not HD, a little behind par on quality of media" ......... that the site still have not got the top vids viewing quality?

But nice to read that they got good updates now.

12-02-10  05:39am

Reply To Message

3

badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #1 - tangub :

To be fair I did not notice the zips until the last day or two in my membership. I downloaded what I could in that short time frame. I would say 85-90% of the them have zips. There does not seem to be an rhyme or reason to which do though. Some from 2007 have zips and a few from 2010 do not, and every where in between.

If you use IDM, and possible other download managers, the sets that do not have zips can be batch downloaded with a bit of creative thinking. Nothing too tough though.

12-02-10  08:14am

Reply To Message

4

badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #2 - Denner :

They re not churning out updates like Twistys or Videobox, but it looked like a video per week. This is a good site to come back for periodic updates and allow to grow in between.

Do not get me wrong, if you have not joined the site in a year or so you will be pleasantly surprised with the new videos. They are definitely better than previous. Looking at the history of the site it is fair to assume they will be trying to make them better. The newer videos are certainly watchable, but it is so easy to be spoiled by the sites putting full HD scenes out at carry double the bitrate.

12-02-10  08:24am

Reply To Message

5

tangub (151) REPLY TO #3 - badandy400 :

Thanks for the info....I really need to become a bit more technical and learn how to use a download manager.
12-02-10  08:24am

Reply To Message

6

Denner (233) REPLY TO #4 - badandy400 :

Thanks for the reply - think I got it now - looks like it's worth to seriously consider once more!
12-02-10  08:38am

Reply To Message

7

badandy400 (103) REPLY TO #5 - tangub :

There are several forum threads about download managers. There are many free ones and many to pay for. I personally use Internet Download Manager, or IDM. If you notice on the newer reviews by the TBP staff they also use IDM and tell you if it will work on the sites. It works on most, but to differing degrees.

Try a couple free ones and I believe IDM has a trial period as well. Downloads.com is a good place to see what is out there. One thing is for sure, if you download more than a few files here and there a manager will save you a lot of time and headache.

12-02-10  12:26pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.