Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Private School Jewel

Private School Jewel (0)

Cryton (10) 09-27-10  09:42pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: • Beautiful model
• Regular updates, usually twice per week
• Genuine high resolution photos - up to 2336×3504px
• ~3,500 photographs (as of mid-September 2010)
• ZIP files for all photosets
• Choice of video formats, with WMV highest quality offered
• Acceptable SD video data rate, on average 2,500Kbps at 29.970fps
• No DRM on videos
• Download managers supported
• 368 images from Blue Eyed Cass and Syhla Jennings’ websites
• Personal blog
• Active forums with good participation from Jewel and webmaster
Cons: • ENORMOUS ugly 480×600px red logo/watermark on image files
• Images slightly noisy and overly compressed
• Small number of videos
• Video SD only - 640×480px
• ZIP and image files all have the same file names
• Random scheduling of webcam shows with little warning and no available archive
• ENORMOUS ugly 480×600px red logo/watermark on image files (can't stress that enough)
Bottom Line: Jewel is an American ‘girl next door’ who’s said to be the youngest legal teen on the Internet as some of her galleries were shot on the day after her 18th birthday. Promo galleries started appearing in November 2006 (as Jewel A. there are also Met-Art shoots from the same time) so the claim of “just turned 18” is a little out-of-date, some shoots have obviously been on-file for a while.

Jewel is exceptionally beautiful and has a fantastic body, especially if you love small(ish) firm, natural breasts. She’s toned without being skinny and has only one small, discreet tattoo, which for those of us who hate such things is rarely visible. Depending on the the shoot Jewel is either fully-shaven, has trimmed pubic hair or a French wax ‘landing strip’. There are no ‘hairy’ shoots.

As for personality; Jewel is engaging and has a natural, fun, if somewhat shy presence on-camera, although that increases the perception of a semi-amateur model who’s “working her way through college”.

The content is of a generally high standard with Jewel posing in various locations and outfits. The schoolgirl sets are some of the most successful but a little more creativity and thought put into the shooting style would be welcome. Stockings look best with heels, T-shirts look great in the rain, voyeuristic ‘nude in public’ settings... that sort of thing. The site is said to have been three years in the making and that should have been more than enough time to break out of the mold and generate a stronger portfolio of images, especially as Jewel is an absolute knockout.

The site’s most egregious sin is that the images are blighted by a HUGE watermark that is often located in the worst possible place - on one of Jewel’s bum cheeks, for example - which ruins some of the photos completely. A secondary annoyance is that all the ZIP and image files have exactly the same name.

There are various video formats available, including for mobile devices, but although artifact-free the best are currently SD-only. Everyone should be producing HD these days.

To-date all the content is conservative, there are just a few ‘spreading’ images and they’re not overtly graphic. There is no insertion whatsoever and when Jewel uses a vibrator it’s only on the outside of her vagina. The latest videos are a little bolder and Jewel has stated on her forum that she’s losing her inhibitions, which can’t happen soon enough. She’s also said that she’s into girls but has yet to find someone who will go all the way with her on video, kissing and caressing is as far as the site currently goes. Jewel is clearly into girl-on-girl action and the one lesbian video is highly charged, making its premature conclusion all the more unfortunate.

Jewel shows huge promise but does need to become less inhibited (without going hardcore). The site is recommended, but check out the many on-line previews first via the likes of FreeOnes or YourDailyGirls.com, they’re representative of how explicit things (don’t) get.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


graymane (33) I don't think anybody can say you haven't provided enough information on this workup. This is the kind of review the regulars here like to see.
09-27-10  10:08pm

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) Agree with graymane1777, this review has great details and opinions. Very well written.
09-27-10  11:11pm

Reply To Message


tangub (155) Exellent review thanks and yes she's a cute looking model. I assume there's no bonus sites here?...can't really see myself paying $36 for a single model site with only 3500 pics.
09-28-10  02:25am

Reply To Message


Cryton (10) REPLY TO #3 - tangub :

Thanks for all the feedback.

There aren't any bonus sites included with the subscription, just the additional photos of Blue Eyed Cass and Syhla Jennings (plus a handful of tiny videos of them both that aren't really worth mentioning).

09-28-10  11:14am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) Yes, I agree with the others that this is a great review, and the site needed it, too!

Too bad about that watermark! What could they possibly be thinking???

09-29-10  03:43pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.