Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Westcoast Gangbangs

Westcoast Gangbangs (0)

Active
80
nygiants03 (162) 06-23-07  11:06am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -I counted exactly 264 scenes on 4 pages ( 109, 50, 50, 55) although it says they are on episode #314
-Consistent updates weekly going back to 2001.
-High resolution zip download as of 12/10/05 and 1200 x 800 since 01/14/06
-Old videos downloable in quicktime, real player, and WMV. (New stuff only real and wmv)
-Newer videos look pretty good
-Basically all amateurs
-Models are everywhere from first time gangbang chicks to experienced sluts
-You can download in dsl or dial-up option
Cons: -Full video download not an option until episode # 164 or 07/28/04
-Old stuff only downloadable in clips and of blow average quality
-There are to many gaps in between each video.
-29.95 for a month is tad expensive
-Navigation and design could improve.
-New stuff only downloadable in full video
-Lack of female orgasms ( there are some but not enough)
- Mostly all facial cumshots
Bottom Line: -Other sites include, Amateur Creampies, Creampie X, Elizabeth Del Mar, DP Amateurs, Her Pretty Face, Creampie Ebony,Hot wifes and girlfriends, & next door amateurs

-The main downfall to me on this site is the gaps in the videos as I said. During each video thereís a cut between each sex position, or the blowjob, or the cumshots. Its really annoying, why cant they just shoot the video throughout? One second the guy is fucking the chick, and the next theres 3 guys hudled around her face getting ready to cum.

-This site is worth the look if you have a thing for amateurs and gangbangs. Most of the chicks look natural however some got fake tits. Most are pretty good looking, but there are some ugly ones as well. Overall, you get some nice content with never before seen chicks, who I donít think are acting.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

elonlybuster (39) I've heard rumors that they've deleted a few scenes because of various reasons, regardless good looking w/ the counting.
09-15-08  06:23am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.