Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Teen Models

Teen Models (0)

Active
88
slutty (111) 09-25-10  02:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 09-26-10  12:01am  (Update History)
Reason: Deleted note that bonus content may not be exclusive per webmaster's response
Pros: -Good variety of attractive ladies, mostly younger euro models
-Excellent download speeds (I averaged better than 1 MB/sec)
-Good quality photography, both size and general photography
-Zip downloads of photosets in 3 sizes
-Decent navigation
-Good bonus content
-Good price with PU discount
-Decent quality videos 1280x720 3000 kbps
-No DRM
-Some download mangers work, DTA did, GetRight didn't
-Ladies are natural from what I can tell, there are some tattoos but nothing too nasty
-Decent sized collection, 153 models with most having a few picture sets and a couple of videos at time of review
-Exclusive content as best I can tell
-Good update schedule, 4 photo sets and 3 videos on average
-Decent navigation, model index and search.
Cons: -Bills through netbilling, which I don't like, but I suppose this is personal preference
-While the models are attractive, most are pretty common, it'd be nice if they had some fresh faces
-Bonus content is a bit iffy, "HD" video has the HD frame size (1280x720), but has poor bitrate (2000 kbps or less).
-As exotics stated, it'd be nice if they named the files a little better.
-Not a huge site, still could use some more growth.
-A bit heavy on toy use/insertions for my tastes
Bottom Line: This is a pretty decent site, especially for those that like toy/masturbation content from young attractive european ladies. As with many of these types of sites I'd prefer there were more stripping and eroticism rather than just cramming stuff up in there, but it is a pretty well done site. The quality of the photography is pretty good and the model quality in general is outstanding.

The bonus content is pretty hit-or-miss. While it does provide some additional hardcore content for those that are looking for that type of material, the quality of the content is generally subpar and the navigation/use of the bonus sites isn't the best.

As Cap'n stated in his comment, if you are looking for a good quality softcore site, this isn't it. This site pretty much fits the definition of midcore.

Overall I'd say this is a pretty good site, it could use some improvement and expansion, but worth joining if you are into young fit european ladies, especially if you like harder lesbian and solo material.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) Good review. The site has a number of attractive teen-early 20s models. But a lot of these models are starting to blur together in my mind. I just don't get the sense of "Wow" that I used to from my early days of looking at nude photos. Metart, which is softcore, and has a huge number of models and photosets, does give me some sets where the model comes across as super attractive.
09-25-10  08:40am

Reply To Message

2

graymane (31) Another winner, slutty. We're gonna have to put you on TV. Maybe sit in with Mr. Ebert.
Seriously though, this was a well written review.

09-25-10  10:17am

Reply To Message

3

TeenModels (18)
Webmaster
Thanks for taking the time to review the site. I'm glad that you are enjoying your membership. Just to clear things up the bonus content is 100% exclusive.

As usual, I take your comments and keep them in mind for the next round of shooting.

take care
Mike

09-25-10  10:22am

Reply To Message

4

slutty (111) REPLY TO #3 - TeenModels :

Thanks for clarifying Mike, I wasn't really sure about the bonus content, it seemed like licensed material when I looked through it, but I'll take your word for it.
09-25-10  11:55pm

Reply To Message

5

slutty (111) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

I agree MetArt definitely gets more attractive models to pose nude, but it is a bit too "artistic" than "erotic" for my tastes. I imagine the artsy nudes are what allow Met to get more attractive models to pose - "hey its art, so don't worry about nudity"
09-25-10  11:58pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.