Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Rough 18

Rough 18 (0)

lk2fireone (196) 09-18-10  03:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Zip file for each photoset.
-Video download formats:
WMV: high, medium, low quality
High quality WMV is 1440x810 (6256kbps)
-Updates once a week video/photoset
-Video runtime : 20 minutes to 60 minutes
-Easy login.
-No DRM.
-Very fast response to an email from tech support. But the response was not helpful.
Cons: -Only 1 size for the photos.
-Photos are a visual record of the video shoot, not an original shoot.
-No streaming option to view the videos.
-Some video files download with no estimate of file size or download time.
-The videos are overly long. A single sex scene should last from 10-20 minutes. There are many sex scenes that last 40-60 minutes, and the action gets boring and repetitious.
-It's strange the female model's face and body are not displayed clearly in the photoshoots.
I want to know what the model looks like, and the screenshots do a lousy job of that.
-Site navigation is poor.
-Search is poor.
-There is no simple listing of the models.
-Videos are large files. The high quality video file can be 1 - 2.3 GB or larger, for a video that runs 20 minutes to 60 minutes.
-Volume on some videos is too low.
-Download problems: on my last 2 video downloads, the download stops after downloading about 1 GB, and won't resume. Currently can't download any videos from this site.
Bottom Line: This is a site for mild BDSM (Bondage,Discipline, Sado-Masochism).
I do not care for the niche.
But even if I did like the niche, I believe the site is not very good.
You can't get a good idea of what
the models look like until you play the video. The photosets should give an excellent idea of what the model looks like, but they mostly don't.
Instead of giving clear photos of the face and body of the model, the photos focus on the "action", the girl being tied or abused or whatever, but you can't see her face or body very clearly in most photos. It's just lousy photography. And in many cases, you are not able to tell the model in 2 different videos is the same girl, because you don't get a clear idea of her face and body.

The videos are too long. A single sex scene can last 20-60 minutes. Beyond 20 minutes, I think people tend to lose interest, find the action boring, repetitive, dull. This is
not a movie with a plot, where you have brief sex scenes along the way. Instead, it's a single sex scene that loses it's impact after you watch
the scene for 10 or 20 minutes.
This is basically dull spanking porn.
My fantasy, to improve the videos, would be to have some guy in a leather costume and mask, come into the scene, and bash the male model who is
doing the spanking, with a metal baseball bat. The girl could jump up and down, screaming, "My hero, my lord", until the spanker is unconscious or dead. Then the girl could give her hero a bj or whatever to finish the scene.
This would serve to add color to the scene (the red blood), plus serve as a break in the dull sex scene, and lead to renewed interest in the next
sex scene (the bj or whatever), and remove the idiot doing the spanking.
I don't usually appreciate watching this type of female abuse, even if it's supposed to be consensual.
On a more realistic note, I have seen a few BDSM scenes that were colorful or interesting or erotic. But not at this site. These vids are just boring and overly long.
The scenes can be 1 boy-1 girl, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 boys-2 girls, 1 boy-2 girls, 2-girls. Most common scene is 1 boy-1 girl and 2 boys-2 girls.
This is a site with a small amount of content. Site just started around middle of 2010. You probably have less than 40 videos, plus 40 photosets. With that small amount of content, you would think the navigation would be extremely simple. But searching through the content is difficult. Trying to look through each video or associated photoshoot is difficult.
The site design is clumsy. Sometimes you can't easily find the photoshoot or video that is supposed to be the mate of a video/photoshoot.

I give the site a score of 60, because of the poor site design, poor navigation, boring videos, stupidity in making the video runtime too long,
and other problems.

This site is a waste of time. And very frustrating. And irritating.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) Another fine review from lk2.
No matter if you're a fan of BDSM or not - this is still one of the Tony Bucks sites - AND I think lk2fireone has made an exceptional fine review here - AND what to avoid...simple as that...

09-18-10  10:04am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Thanks for the support, Denner. I wanted to download a few videos from the site to see what they were like. But as I said in this review, I can't currently download a complete video file. And a partial file is not playable. That is why I gave the site an extra-low score.

There are other sites in the network that are much better.

09-18-10  11:01am

Reply To Message


RustyJ (145) Great review that made me laugh! Too bad the site wasn't as high quality as the review ;)
09-19-10  04:33am

Reply To Message


slutty (111) Hey man, interesting review. I actually kind of liked some of the material on this site, probably just cause I thought the Flora model was cute. I agree the site navigation is poor, but it is consitent with all of the network sites. And the site is small. But I think it was kind of nice to have a somewhat "lighter" BDSM site, instead of the crazy rought stuff you often see - or at least in the scenes I downloaded. Also, in my experience scenes from sites in this niche often run quite long.
09-25-10  03:00am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) REPLY TO #4 - slutty :

slutty, the reason I gave the site an extra-low score was because I could not see a lot of the material. I need to download the video file before I can view it. And after downloading a couple of video files, I was not able to download any complete files because the download would stop after downloading about 1 GB (the file would be incomplete). And you can't play a partial file, you need the entire file to unzip it to get a playable file. So my experience with this site was very frustrating.

Obviously, if you did not encounter the problems I did (made worse by my slow DSL download speed of 150 KB/s), then you would score the site higher than I did.

But like I mentioned elsewhere, a site score can depend a lot on the personal experience you (or I) have with that site.

I would be interested in reading your review of this site, or any of the other sites in this network. That would also give PU members further information on the sites, that could be helpful.

There are definitely some good-looking models at this network.

09-25-10  05:03am

Reply To Message


slutty (111) REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :

Curious, I never had any problems downloading from any of this company's sites. Perhaps the files were so big your connection timed out after a while, I dunno. Partial WMV downloads sometimes work for me...
09-25-10  09:54pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.