Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Color Climax

Color Climax (0)

Active
90
studslut (8) 01-12-07  08:21pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (7)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - THE SMUTTIEST OF RETRO PORN
Cons: - QUITE A LOT OF UNATTRACTIVE DANES & SWEDES
- LUMPY BULGES GALORE!
- FUR PIE CENTRAL!
- INFREQUENTLY UPDATED
Bottom Line: I've been subscribed to CC since before I was supposed to. It's really dirty stuff from the days of the 8mm stag reels.

Most of the features are from the early seventies, and showcase Nordic models doing things that would be considered taboo even today, so I can only imagine that back then it was a downright act of sadism on behalf of the producers.

I myself avoid watersport porn like I do girls on the rag, but because I'm a European 70's afficionado, I have to tolerate it here. And it's a part of almost every feature, too.

The girls are for the most part, ugly. Sorry, I'm not going to lie. None of them are on the level of say, an Uschi Digart so don't expect to see big-titted Swiss misses. Also the sex ranges from dull to terrible. The appeal for me here is the historical value of the CC brand. CC if you don't know were among the first major porn studios, covering everything from basic sex to barnyard beastialty, to something they'd probably not like to be remembered for, kiddie porn. That's right, CC built most of their company on exploiting very little girls in the very beginning of their run. Of course none of that is available on the site, but it's a part of their identity that will never be forgiven.

Like I said, if you like vintage flicks from the 70's, particularly those with greasy Europeans with incontinence problems, then this is the site for you. If this isn't your niche then I don't suggest that you peek here.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Belthazar (0) Don´t be afraid of ugly models, because they are not ugly at all.
01-13-07  10:38pm

Reply To Message

2

Davit (46) I don't get this review. You made this site out to be pretty horrible with fat, ugly, hairy women, and infrequent updates (although given your description of the site, I would regard that as a small mercy!) and yet you awarded it a massive 90 score! It doesn't add up!
01-20-08  09:26am

Reply To Message

3

SnafulandUK (0) What a typical shizoid english fuck-up this guy is. He makes out that it is something abnormal to have women with pubic hair in erotic movies and then goes on to protest too much about kiddie porn which isn't even on the site. Well if you like women to look like they haven't even reached puberty what does that make you?
12-25-08  08:42am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.