Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Sweet And Nude

Sweet And Nude (0)

Drooler (220) 09-03-10  01:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Well-organized site with simple, straightforward navigation
+Excellent quality, exclusive photos!
+Good-sized archive of over 33,000 pics
+32 babes, most of them stunning Euro models that you’ve probably seen before and probably don’t mind seeing yet again! (They’ve just added Euphrat!)
+Variety of settings, indoors and out
+Zip files download quickly after you’ve done a few
+Excellent visitor’s site allows you to view all of the thumbs of all of the galleries, by model or by update
+Model pages give you an idea of what’s to be posted in the future for each model
+Finally accepts MasterCard and not just Visa
+Reasonably priced at 19.95 for a month – if you’re just going for the archives
Cons: -Galleries are broken into pages/zips of 30-40 pics each. (See BL for why this is a total pain, and visit the site yourself to see how it’s done.) It’s too bad that they don’t give you the option of a single download for an entire gallery.
-Updates only about 22 days out of each month (M-F), and each update is one of those 30-40 pic pages. You’ll typically only get 3 complete galleries in a month’s time.
-Photos only in one size, 3000 px on the long end. (But I’ll take it!)
-About 10% (13) of the galleries are just too dark and shadowy and/or have the model covered in what I guess could be called “artistic grime.”
Bottom Line: I’ll start on a positive note by stressing how good the photo quality is here. They are crisp and clear, and at 3000 pixels, they’ll have you bounding in joy. Sites that are consistently this good in this way are rare.

Yet it really is annoying how they break the galleries into zips of 30-40 pics each. Worse, when unzipped, the resulting folder contains yet another folder of the same name. Open that to get those 30-40 pics. Imagine having to deal with this as many times as there are zips of all of the galleries you get. That’s way too much wasteful packaging that has to be stuffed into the trash can.

But it’s worse still because each page/zip is part of the beginning to the end of the gallery “story.” So page 4a has her fully clothed, stripping, naked, and playing around. And so does 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e ... to sometimes several points further in the alphabet. And the file names correspond (“a_01,” “b_01,” etc.). So after you’ve gone through all of the unzipping and extra-and-unnecessary folder opening, you have to arrange the photos yourself into something more coherent.

Well, you don’t HAVE to, I suppose. You could just throw them all into one master folder and enjoy them in 4 to 10 or more repeating narrative cycles.

But linear thinkers won’t like it. Cycles are for laundry. ‘nuff said.

Bottom line: There’s enough here of very beautiful girls in excellent-quality photos to keep you busy collecting, but don’t be surprised if you find yourself in a love/hate relationship with the letter “i.”

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Capn (28) A fine review of an interesting site.

I took a look around the tour area, which I find to be very open & useful.

For me, it is nearly there.
I found 2 main irritations.
The lack of sequence in the zipping of the sets, & the fact that most sets start out only partially clothed or nude.

I am sure it will be an excellent site for most softcore photo fans though.

Thanks for drawing my attention to it.

Cap'n. :0)

09-03-10  01:33am

Reply To Message


tangub (151) Thanks for a fine review. This looks like my kind of site but yes the organisation of the photo sets looks like a right mess and too much like hard work to sort out, i like my photo sets to start clothed and finish naked. If ever they reorganise the sets into a single zip download running in correct sequence i'd consider joining but not in its current format.
09-03-10  05:25am

Reply To Message


anyonebutme (14) Send off an email to the owner of the site, he's actually quite nice to chat with. I don't like the photosets divided up into groups of 40 images either - but I've had a little custom program here that I can reprogram to quickly rename files in any way I want. For instance, on his end, if just the letter & picture number in the filenames were switched then they could all be placed in one directory and be in the proper order. Like the first photo for Eufrat's set is 0031_01_a_01.jpg if it were changed to 0031_01_01_a.jpg , and image 0031_01_b_01.jpg were changed to 0031_01_01_b.jpg alphabetical order is now also chronological order of the entire set.

The first photoset released with Eufrat is absolutely stunning to see in it's entirety, so, try asking him, see if he'll budge!

09-03-10  07:45am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.