Review Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Monahan (38)
|
I've commented on the sloppiness of model identification and on the lousy search function in previous reviews. Unfortunately both aspects have gotten worse despite promises by the webmaster to correct the problem.
This failure is a real shame because the site is, by far, the richest site on the web with an unimaginably huge amount of content growing at the rate of 1800+ DVD's per year.
Without a decent model identification process and with a less than adequate search capability, it's virtually impossible to find all the scenes containing a specific model.
|
08-02-10 11:13pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
nymano (10)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Monahan :
I do not search for models so I am not much interested in model search. I am using category search and they have a good one IMHO.
|
08-03-10 04:57am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
RustyJ (145)
|
Regarding your con "Private videos are old": Isn't it funny how our pros and cons can be so opposite? The old Private videos are exactly what I like to see. The new ones look like videos from everyone else ;)
|
09-10-10 11:25pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|