Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Teen Kasia

Teen Kasia (0)

Newbie
50*
HonestDave (2) 06-18-10  06:33am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Not many im sorry to say. The model is very attractive but as far as solo sites go this is pretty poor.

Some realy nice strip video but only around 3 or 4
Cons: Terrible Video Quality with short scenes and some with no action (candids).
I could be all day listing the negatives.

The site design is easy to navigate but that's because there is no search criteria. Its the most basic site you can get.
Bottom Line: ==================================================
INFORMATION
==================================================
Video Quality: Standard, Low/Terrible
Video Amount: 72 (Tiny Collection)
Video Content Length: 3 - 10 mins

Picture Type: Amateur model, Professional Photos
Picture Quality: 803 x 1200 (Low Quality)
Picture Amount: 4,095

Download Managers: Yes
Download Speed Max(My connection 60MBPS): Unknown

Other
Advertisement: Ads on borders,No Flash, No Popups
Updates: (every 2 weeks)
Exclusive Content: No
Navigation: 9 (how easy is it to see information)
Niches/Search/Tags: (0) None
Site Design Layout : 4
Page Load Times: 9
Price: Expensive


WOULD I RECOMMEND THIS SITE: NO

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

rearadmiral (328) Decent review and a great warning for those of us who like these kinds of sites. Some of the preview pictures are fairly high resolution. I assume that these are a tease and the real ones inside are smaller? And the price! If the site is as bad as you say, $30 seems pretty steep.
06-19-10  08:26am

Reply To Message

2

Khan
PU Staff
REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :

This is a Phil-Flash site and he usually has pretty high quality pics (and most vids). The pics I have from the site are 1600 x 1071

As far as the content not being exclusive ... well, not sure that's entirely correct. Kasia has modeled for other sites (I know she has a few sets at FEMJOY) but I think the content here is pretty much exclusive. The exception might be a set or two that also show on Face Down Ass Up University, another Phil-Flash site.

06-19-10  09:29am

Reply To Message

3

PinkPanther (46) I think the issue of quality is as much taste and judgement as anything else. Personally, I'm a big fan of Phil-Flash's work and in my opinion, nobody shot Kasia better than Phil did - nobody show-cased her personality the way that he did and she clearly had a blast working for him, judging from all the laughing she did in her work for him.

I also really like the outfits that he had her wear and all the dancing, stripping, teasing stuff is great.

But Phil's got his style, which has amateur origins, and his stuff is not glamour stuff, so pics and vids can have blurry elements at times, and if that ruins it for you then that's the fact of the matter, regardless of the dimensions of the pics or vids.

Also on a factual matter - the dates of the updates show on the home page, and while there were a couple of times that there was 2 weeks between updates, mainly this site has been updated weekly.

I've seen the Kasia material that Phil did that was posted at FDAU.com and at Phil-Flash.com and I like it a lot - but then, I'm a big fan of his style. I've checked out a lot of what Kasia did for other sites and I like Phil's work with her much more - more personality, more engagement equals more erotic heat for me. Femjoy did good work with her too.

As to the price - it ain't any bargain, that's for sure. You have to be a big fan of Kasia to spend $30 for a month of only her updates. There are plenty of sites offering a lot more value, that's for sure.

06-19-10  11:16am

Reply To Message

4

HonestDave (2) REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :

When I compare image size I compare it to the best vs the worst e.g Metart has huge sizes. so its about normal size. In relation to the size I just picked an image at random and looked at the size so :/ sorry if that's not the average sorry. Oh and about 50% of the videos i found on phil flash site. so its still not exclusive as far as Im concerned.

Thanks for reply everyone

07-02-10  12:32pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.