Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Dream Kelly

Dream Kelly (0)

Active
71
Gazette Risque (55) 05-31-10  04:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * A website devoted to a very cute girl who has been around for about 5 years now!
* Loads of videos, about 200+
* Videos available in WMV, MOV and "WMVHD-ish"
* Many bonus sites that come with it
* A nice mix of videos with her being either a brunette or blond
* Gives access to the entire network.
* Updates are although not very often, pretty frequent. About 1 every other week on average
* Still the same Dream Kelly, this can be good as well as bad. She just hasn't changed much repertoire-wise.
* All exclusive content
* Talks more in videos, though usually the same stuff over and over again of her wanting you (inside her), it's an improvement.
* No more videos in 2 parts which made for 2 half updates each other week.
Cons: * A girl with a little identity crisis, blond to brunette to blond...
* She does the same things she did in videos 3 years ago, maybe a bit more close up masturbation.
* No big changes in the site in 3 years. Think navigation, type of videos etc.
* Download speed limit, about 1700-1800 KBps.
* Certainly not download manager friendly, the links expire within 5 minutes.
* No upload dates with the videos or galleries. So I'm not quite sure on the updates anymore.
* The HD videos were 720p videos for about 100 videos. They now recently switched back to 960x540 which is quite strange.
* Still advertises with the cute blond and pink streaked Kelly while she looked like that 4-5 years ago
* Navigation could use a make over, still no search function which is quite annoying with 200+ videos.
* Older videos aren't worth it
* Still no interaction with Kelly.
* Talks more during videos
* Galleries aren't zipped.
* Videos start playing automatically
* No platinum blond hair with pink streaks
Bottom Line: DreamKelly is a website devoted to the awesome Kelly who has been around for almost 5 years now!

Actually, I wanted to wait doing this review until July because that will be her 5 year anniversary on this website. I've done a review on her site before, some 3 years ago.
Let's see if things have changed a bit since...

Let's start off with the homepage. They still advertise with the hot young Kelly with the platinum blond hair and cute pink streaks. Really? She hasn't looked like in 4 years now! In the meantime she has gone brunette to blond again. Ok, so we know now that's a lie. No biggie but it's something to think of before subscribing.

Let's go inside!
On the homepage you can see which new videos and galleries they have put up. The only thing missing is the dates which they used to messed with a couple of years ago. They had the tendency to change the upload dates so it would seem they had updated quite frequently. They obviously decided to leave new subscribers in the dark now.

The video page isn't all that better. Same old layout which wouldn't have been a problem if the navigation was good. They offer 41 pages with 5 videos each. This makes for 200+ videos.
No search function and 40+ pages with 200+ videos makes for lousy navigation. Oh well, let's watch a video to get an idea of the quality...

The first 50 videos you can just skip as the quality is really bad. Even for 5 years ago. When you hit around page 28-29, you're in HD country. This is where they began with WMVHD, though maybe not all of them are 720, most of them are. They kept this up until about half a year go when they decided to quit making videos in 2 parts. They now make full videos of Kelly still doing the same masturbation routine but more closeup and with her talking more.

When you want to download a movie, you have to open the page for each video. It then starts playing automatically in Windows Media Player.
This is not only annoying but can be hard on your PC as well. If you want to download you have the option of WMV, MOV and "WMVHD". If you intend on using a download manager, be aware that the download links expire within 5 minutes! Also, the speed gets capped off at 1700-1800 Kilobytes per second.

The galleries you ask? Three words: Not worth it. Not zipped, rarely updated, in the last update she's still a brunette.

All in all, the website hasn't changed much. The videos are a bit more close up and more talking which is a plus. Also, no more videos in 2 parts. But other than that there's not really an improvement.
Better yet they got a little worse in some parts. The quality of the videos went down, the update dates are gone, galleries are neglected.

On a personal note, I loved this site. But after 5 years it might be time for a little change. And I really miss that platinum blonde hair with the pink streaks which she still advertises with...

Is it worth the money? Maybe for a month if you haven't seen her before...

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Denner (233) Nice review - no, not only nice - but very thorough..thumbs up!

Kelly is a sweet thing and it's impossible NOT to come across some material out there even if not a member.
This reviews gives you the - I think - entire picture. AND maybe I'll hold my horses and wait or just skip it. She's cute and all, but the site seems to been a little off??? (quite serious cons)

Anyway: It's a shame she's gone brunette - or am I mistaken??? She was so damn cute as a blond...

05-31-10  09:57am

Reply To Message

2

Gazette Risque (55) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Wow, thank you for the compliment!

The site is indeed a little off. It's just that it's all the same and after 5 years one would expect a little variety. And it's just not very user friendly even after 5 years.

As for the hair, she went brunette about 4 years ago I think and went back to being a blond about half a year ago. So now she's a blond but not blond like she used to be, platinum. No she's more a "regular blond".

Hope it gave you some insight and it will help you with your decision.
Thanks again for the thumbs up, really appreciate it!

05-31-10  10:09am

Reply To Message

3

Denner (233) REPLY TO #2 - Gazette Risque :

Your're welcome, magman - I just thought it was a pleasure/great to - now and then - read such a fine review as yours!!!!
It'd be welcome with more of that standard - here...

05-31-10  10:45am

Reply To Message

4

PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #1 - Denner :

Personally, I wouldn't mind the blonde-to-brunette shift - in fact, I thought that some of the sexiest work that this model did was when she first made the shift from Teen Kelly to Dream Kelly and she was an auburn-haired hard-body and seeeeeeexxxxxyyyyy!!!!

Then something happened and they stopped with pics that looked natural and started with pics with layers of laquer on them and she lost a LOT of weight - and instead of being a sexy young auburn-haired BABE, she was a skinny girl with the only pics layered with 2 feet of laquer and anything that I've seen from this site since then - including recent increasingly rare updates - are just depressing.

05-31-10  06:43pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.