Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Fucking Machines

Fucking Machines (1)

mr smut (42) 05-23-10  06:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + this is the original site for machines fucking gorgeous girls
+ lots of content going back until September 2000
+ forums for interaction between users and the team of kink.com
+ newest movies are good quality and a maximum of HD with 1280x720 pixel resolution. Videos come in several formats and sizes.
+ now 3 updates peer week
+ mostly sexy models that really seems to enjoy the machine fucking
+ amateur girl Fridays bring new and fresh faces into the world of fucking machines
+ videos normally start with an interview section and end with a conclusion about the girl's experience about the shoot
+ High download speeds
+ members get discounts on other kink.com sites (except The Upper Floor and Device Bondage)
Cons: - older content isn't good enough for today's standard (but still unique and fun to watch)
- model bios could often need more details and sometimes you won't find all scenes when searching for a particular model
- would love to see full ZIPs for all fotos and a better resolution than the current 1200 pixels on the long side
- most of the machines are very noisy and it keeps me wonder how a girl can cum riding such a loud monster
- download managers won't work
Bottom Line: If you can cope with the cons mentioned above the site really offers interesting content for those curious enough to see girls being fucked by machines. Ever since this site started they tried to improve quality of content.

I used to be a member some years ago but wasn't satisfied back then. The picture quality around 2005 was poor and the video quality also didn't give me a thrill. In any case this stuff only works as video content. The stills are nice but the actual action is missing what makes it not worth if you are only interested in picure series.

Sometimes it's hard for the girls to keep the machines under control. The dildos slip out and mostly it's only possible to get into action again by stopping the machines to insert the dildos again.

The best experiences came from the amateur Friday updates. The girls are mostly fresh faces that seem to 100% get of while being fucked with machinery. To see them being completly exhausted right after they've experienced this for the first time is worth the money alone.

By the way it's nice to see girls of different ethnicities being shot for fucking machines if only the wouldn't almost only concentrate on girls below 30 years of age. I'd like to see a MILF or maybe a GILF type of girl from time to time.

I experienced very high download speeds with all kink.com sites but unfortunately my download manager won't work. Because of the large size of the videos (up to more than one GB) a fast internet connection is needed.

If you are curious I would recommend to give this site a try. I'm sure you won't be dissappointed.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


RagingBuddhist (65) Thanks for the review - this is a site I'd had on the back burner for a long time. I saw the name in the list of new reviews, liked what you had to say about it and now it's a soon-to-join site
05-25-10  03:24pm

Reply To Message


williamj (9) I agree with cons. The very older videos are poor. But the overall newer content going back two years is very good. Itís worth a peek if you want to see girls getting fucked silly with machines. They do get fuck good and hard. Enjoyable site overall. Worth a one month peek. Their previews tell pretty much what to expect.
05-25-10  09:19pm

Reply To Message


mr smut (42) REPLY TO #1 - RagingBuddhist :

Hope you like it too. I'm interested to read what you think about this site.
05-25-10  10:30pm

Reply To Message


williamj (9) Right on target review. Enjoy the site.
05-27-10  08:27pm

Reply To Message


ace of aces (179) not to understand that they don`t upgrade the old files.
05-28-10  09:00am

Reply To Message


mr smut (42) REPLY TO #5 - ace of aces :

Honestly spoken this is nonsense from an economical point of view. The content already made enough money throughout the years and to post-process ist again costs more time and money than it will actually earn. I'd say that most users will go for the newest stuff only. I may be different because I value some of the older scenes much higher in terms of entertainment than the new "smut" they offer :-).
05-28-10  10:03am

Reply To Message


ace of aces (179) REPLY TO #6 - mr smut :

economical you may be right, but only from theire pov :) i have rather all filed on my hd, and the older ones are great but the quality is so low, that i really think of deleting them everytime i see them. but as a collector....;)
06-02-10  10:15am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.