Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Oldje

Oldje (1)

Active
66
BabyGetReal (32) 05-21-10  07:08pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Creative scenarios, very unusual.
Gorgeous slim women, many very cute.
Mostly natural breasts.
As a 70 year old, the fantasy of a beautiful young woman coming onto me is very attractive.
Dialog, when there is any, is in English.
Guys don't walk on already hard.
Normal sized dicks.
No brainless rough hard banging away.
No fake moaning.
Cons: Boring, repetitive, passionless sex.
Apparently no interest in arousing the women.
Sometimes it appears that the men coming is the girls mouths is faked, with fake semen preloaded in the girls mouths.
The price is WAY WAY too high ($38/month).
Early vids very low res; later ones low res or OK; a few very recent ones are stunningly hires.
Too many long closeups.
Downloads all have the same names so you have to rename every one.
There is usually annoyingly loud music that doesn't fade out -- but it doesn't matter because nobody ever really gets aroused.
Bottom Line: A couple of the very recent very high resolution videos are in beautiful outdoor settings. They move slowly and sensuously, with a lot of kissing. About half of the videos are scripted with the guys taking advantage of the girls (I can do without that). In the other half, the girls tease and come onto the guys -- which I love. So I had high anticipation about this site -- but it turned out to be one of the least arousing sites to which I've subscribed.

The creativity and variety of the scenarios is really unusual and is the best thing about this site. Also the lack of hard banging and rushed sex. The slow sensuous approach is refreshing. Unfortunately, this is coupled with terrible directing and editing -- if the goal is to be erotic.

The director/editor seems to insist on so many minutes each for a series of positions, without any concern for what is actually happening. There is no chemistry between any of the couples. They show no evidence of having fun, being playful, or getting aroused. There is no spontaneity. Apparently they are just doing what the director told them to do. Even if a little spark starts to grow, they are told to change positions and it kills any spark that started.

In only one or maybe two of all the 30 videos that I watched, the girls actually got aroused and maybe orgasmed. This was not respected, featured, emphasized -- the director/editor did not seem to notice or care that this happened -- it was incidental -- and it was not erotic to watch.

The emphasis is on the girl pleasuring the man. Most have very brief cunnilingus or finger fucking, but only to please the man, and it stops after a moment, regardless of whether the woman might show a little spark of excitement. All videos end with a blow job and the guy (supposedly) coming in the girl's mouth. In some cases the guy jacks off and really comes; in others, the girl blows him and maybe he really comes, or it is faked.

A give away about the attitude in this site is that in all the preview stills that label each video, very few if any show the girl with an expression of actual enjoyment or arousal. Instead, she is always looking at the camera with her mouth open, a sure sign that she is not aroused.

For what this site offers, the price is WAY WAY too high (30 euros, about $38/month). Actresses names are not given. There is no search mechanism. There are no dates for the "updates". Most of the videos have poor resolution.

The bonus site (class-3some) is even worse.

It is unusual that I download 30 videos from a site and don't find a single one that I want to keep, but that is what happened here. They seemed to have a good idea and some real creativity, but the direction/editing kills any eroticism.

Sometimes they show outtakes at the end, and in these, often the actors are laughing and having fun -- unlike in the main video!

CONTINUED IN A "REPLY"

Reply To Review

Review Replies (8)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

BabyGetReal (32) This is a continuation of my review because I ran out of room:

There were a couple of videos where I found the teasing and foreplay erotic (sunny side of noise, puzzle of lust) but once the sex started, it was boring and passionless.

The site has a large number of videos (29 pages with ~20/page, so at least several hundred). After downloading 30 and finding them very consistently unerotic, I ran out of patience and quit. I was hoping to find the occasional exception with chemistry, fun, arousal, orgasms, horny girls, but didn't. If someone else found such videos at this site, please tell me the TITLES -- I still have 28 days left of my subscription!

05-21-10  07:13pm

Reply To Message

2

Belthazar (0) REPLY TO #1 - BabyGetReal :

This site really works for me, because i like old guys with young ladies even if I am 33 years old. I understand that every man has different taste. I have about 120 vids from this site, so i will post some titles i think worth.
Girls - many of them are European experienced pornstars
Men - I recognized only one or two former pornstars
Fake cumshots - quite common even in mainstream porn industry :) - in My little secretary with a wett pussy.. - You can clearly see girl loading her mouth with water mixed with sugar.
Titles i like: Tall and Mini, Hot seduction in the snow, Crazy sex obsessed bitch, Apples of desire, Hot Car Wash, Burglar is paying, At the garbage dump, Students Enquiry, Extra Lessons etc.

05-22-10  06:06pm

Reply To Message

3

BabyGetReal (32) REPLY TO #2 - Belthazar :

Dear Belthazar, I really, really do appreciate your recommendations of specific titles -- something that too few PU reviewers bother to do. I downloaded and watched all of your recommended titles. I am sorry to say that none of them changed my opinion or seemed to me to deviate from the ~30 I had already seen. In "Burglar is paying" I agree that she is a little more real and less passionless than most, with some really nice hip movements, but still the woman seems in the main unresponsive -- just there to please the man. None of the women at Oldje seem genuinely horny or able to get real satisfaction from these men. The woman in "Hot seduction in the snow" was especially beautiful in the high-resolution of that video, and I saved that one even though she was unresponsive. Thanks for the titles!
05-24-10  08:09pm

Reply To Message

4

Gazette Risque (55) REPLY TO #3 - BabyGetReal :

Great review. You certainly make some very good points.

The fake cumshots is what bothers me the most about the site. Sure the acting is terrible but I've seen worse... The communication between the actors and director is obviously what's killing this site.

A while ago I finally found a video that I kept. Well, I kept many but this one I actually like so I recommend it ;)

Working Girl is what the video is called. I still have some issues with some of the angles in this clip and the acting and actor. But it's worth a watch in my opinion.

Anyway, great review!

05-25-10  07:52am

Reply To Message

5

BabyGetReal (32) REPLY TO #4 - Gazette Risque :

Dear magaman, Thanks for your comments and for naming a title that you like. I downloaded that one too. (It is laborious to find a specific title since there is no search mechanism provided at Oldje, and you can't even use the browser's find to look for a word in the title on the current page -- since the title is in a graphic!) Sorry, but there's nothing in "Working Girl" that seems better to me than in the others I've checked from Oldje. Anyway, I do appreciate your feedback!
05-26-10  05:54pm

Reply To Message

6

Gazette Risque (55) REPLY TO #5 - BabyGetReal :

They could certainly benefit from a search engine or some kind of search mechanism.
As for the video I recommended. It's mostly the angles that did it for me. Still nothing really special but I just thought I'd share my findings.

Too bad you didn't like it very much but not really a surprise as it's hard to find a really good video there ;)

05-27-10  02:55am

Reply To Message

7

pinkerton (37) Hmmm, I think you've been a bit unfair on the content of this site.

I've seen much of the content of this site and I have to say I was quite impressed at how (ironically) fresh it seemed, probably because the guys were less "stunt cock" than found in a standard porn site, and I must admit I found the sight of a gorgeous young woman sucking and fucking a much older guy to be a real turn-on.

In most of the vids the guy does pay the girl(s) a lot of oral attention and there are are more 69s and longer-duration clit-licking than in most other sites. I can't say I found the sex boring and repetitive, but some of the scenes are quite humourous, esp. one outdoor scene where just after the guy cums on her face, a cat walks up and curls by her head. Priceless!

I particularly liked the scenes (with Lucky and with Suzy Diamond - yes there are a few porn regulars here, Claudia Rossi, Patricia whateverhernameis and Jennifer Stone) where the girl is getting fucked lying flat on her belly.

The cumshots aren't as impressive as your average site but many of them are good, check out "The Wine Bar" scene for example.

If I was a current member I'd probably review and rate it 78% or more, but as you mention in your review, it is very expensive at around 30 euro, so maybe that's why you rated it quite low.

06-07-10  01:24pm

Reply To Message

8

BabyGetReal (32) REPLY TO #7 - pinkerton :

Thanks for your reply, pinkerton. I think your tastes and mine simply differ, which is fine of course. I don't think I was unfair, since tastes and opinions do differ. Price was not the main reason I gave it a low score, but rather for the other reasons I stated. If you look at my profile and my other reviews, you'll see what I personally am looking for and did not find at oldje, despite its uniqueness and potential. Anyway, thanks for your reply!
06-07-10  06:29pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.