Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Nubile Girls HD

Nubile Girls HD (0)

Active
78
BadMrFrosty (56) 05-13-10  05:37am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very attractive young ladies.

Good quality video (8 are 1080P @ ~7mbits/sec, rest 720P @ 4mbits/sec) and photos (3000 x 2000, some even better)

Photos are zipped

Decent amount of content (72 videos with picture sets plus network access)

Very good download speeds. Downloading a couple of videos at once with DownThemAll maxed my 100mbit connection.

No DRM, no download limits, download managers work, no regional pricing, Reputable billing through Epoch or Segpay
Cons: Photo sets do not always match the video

Some photo sets are just hi-res screen caps

Basic interface, no search or model index and little to no information about the videos.

Model names do not match with the rest of the network (see rant below)

A lot of the network sites are no longer updating

No update schedule, last update was 10 days ago.
Bottom Line: The thing about this site that annoys me the most is the seemingly random model naming. There are a few quite well known faces on this site (Sasha Rose, Nessa Devil, Mandi Dee) but none of them have their correct names. To make matters worse, a large percentage of the models also feature in other sites on the network, again under completely different names. I don't know if its laziness or maybe their system randomly assigns Russian sounding names when new scenes are uploaded but its bloody annoying!

This one was quite hard to rate. While everything about the site is generally good, it is just such a mish mash. Some hardcore, some soft-core. Some solo, some lesbian. Some 1080P videos, some 720P.

It seems like they either found a bunch of clips that were not used on their other sites or licensed it. Although the site is new, not all of the content is. When I compare the models on here to other scenes from 2008 / 2009 they seem to be about the same age.

I would not recommend going out of your way to join this site but as the network includes some decent sites (gag-n-gape being a good one) I don't think it will be money wasted.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to BadMrFrosty!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.