Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com (5)

schlemihl (2) 05-04-10  03:21pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - huge amount of content
- numerous models
- also some good-looking models
- in lezcuties, cutiesgalore and analteenangels a new generation of super-stunning, slim, tight, elegant, smart eastern-european teentopmodels is coming up
- great variety of tastes, specials, fetishes
- new videos in high definition
- site navigation and search function are ok
- models are neat, in fine fettle and well-dressed
- photos and newer videos are of great quality and colour
- the distinctive characteristic 21sextury "kink" according photos in perspective and expression of models
- number of photos per set is ok
Cons: - videos too seldom to my taste, means:
- too much close-ups and medium shots. my preferences are long shot and figure shot
- models are styled neat but not as precious, discreet and noble as could be done, fashion style conforms to lower middle class, not academics or upper class
- industry-typical boring and frustrating habit, to underline that teens are teens by dressing them like babies
- some models seem to pass through industry-specific progressive americanization and basifying
- average number of photos per set could be slightly higher
- they use some dirty tricks to outwit your download-manager, so get the hang of outfoxing them back ;-)
Bottom Line: - I give them 75 points, because they apparently tend to stagnate in their efforts to improve. It is obvious that they can do better. So they need review. They show that they earn a lot of money. But for elite content is too poor.
- By the way, it would be fine if older videos would be reconditioned to HD.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Tom22 (6) I agree with you on their camera work, they keep the camera too close too much of the time. And instead of a slow zoom to a close up shot, its always an "instant cut" to ultra close. That's bad editing and/or camera work in my opinion. You lose all perspective of the girl when they do it instantly like that. Euro and American sites love that method but the Russians get it right, a slow steady zoom to close up. I think that's one of the several reasons why the Russians are kicking the crap out of Western and Euro sites right now.

Will the Euro and American porn producers ever figure it out --- I doubt it. It took them almost 30 years to learn to turn the lights on.

06-05-10  11:05am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.06 seconds.