Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Fucking Gamble

Fucking Gamble (0)

Active
90
Torn4do (13) 04-23-10  01:30am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - This is really something else!
- Reality emphasized all the way
- Huge variety of locations, settings and games (see details below), all exclusive content
- Very interactive site with an inside point system (and a chance to witness a shooting)
- Ohh, the gorgeous Eastern - European girls... :-)
- Tons of video formats to choose from, including 1080p 12mbit/s!
- No watermarks, No DRM
- Price is good, especially through TBP at $19.95 / mo
- Fancy stuff: game simulation, creating your own profile, etc
- Download speed (1 - 1.5 megabytes / sec (not Mbit!) ) - it is blazing fast, seems like they really fixed it for US users after some earlier complaints; or I'm just lucky. :-)
Cons: - Still picture quality
- Looong movies
- Rather new site (amount of content isn't huge yet)
- It might take some time to 'get it'
- Most movies in foreign language (need to read subtitles)
Bottom Line: OK, so I came on to PU.com a while ago to see if there was anything new, and that's how I came across with FuckingGamble.com. If I had to sum it up, I'd say something like "These guys took strip poker to the highest level I've ever seen.". :-)

One thing to be understood is that this is more than a place where you can view / download content: this is a place where you can play online or for real using the very same, advanced system they used to create their movies. While for me mostly the movies were of interest, for others out there (swingers) all these features might be very appealing, especially that they're available for free. IMO it can get a little time consuming to go through and understand everything: how you can create a profile of your own preferences, how you can play the game for real or in an online simulation, etc. Don't get me wrong, it's the same way as most good games: it takes some time to 'get it', so that then you can have some serious fun.

As for the content. Still picture quality isn't that good, as they're edited and corrected versions of actual screenshots. They're OK to watch, but certainly not high quality - something I couldn't care less about to be honest. :-) Top resolutions are 1280x720 or 1920x1080, depending on when the movie was released.

Video quality - on the other hand - is usually excellent. There's flash streaming in several different formats, downloading in both wmv and mp4 all the way from low resolution 100kbit/s to 12mbit/s... the first twenty something movies' top resolution is 1280x720, while all the newer ones are 1920x1080 (Full HD). They have about 32 fully released movies to date, each ranging in length from about 2 hours to 3,5 hours, and most of them being close to 3 hours. Updates are 30 minute long parts of movies, and they release one part every single day. Like I said earlier, movies are a little too long for my taste... I'd be perfectly happy with something about 1,5 hours long, but that might be just me. The content itself is what makes it worth for me: other than the first minute or so, there's unscripted conversation going on, and the participants seem to have genuine fun while playing these games. The variety of implementations was shocking for me: from sunny beaches to gokart tracks, regular card games, etc. Most of the movies were shot in Hungary, which means 2 things: first, the models are hot! I just love Eastern - European girls... secondly, most movies are subtitled, which is OK for me, but some others might find it inconvenient. There seem to be some American games coming out though.

Overall, if you want to see something out of ordinary, movies in very professional quality, and you can live without glamorous photosets and the usual boring "Ohh Yess, fuck me!" screaming, then you should definitely check this one out, at least for the trial period to see it for yourself!

Note:Please see more technical details in the official TBP review - I had no space to include everything.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

mbaya (356) I liked your review; it gives an accurate description of how interesting the site is. I signed up for the trial and agree the site has a lot of potential.
04-23-10  03:20am

Reply To Message

2

Capn (28) I hope they improve the quality of the photosets.

Cap'n. :0/

04-23-10  06:49am

Reply To Message

3

Torn4do (13) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

Thanks for the compliments! I really did try to rather give a feel for what's going on in the site instead of listing a bunch of facts; I'm glad to hear I didn't (at least completely) fail. :-)
04-23-10  03:48pm

Reply To Message

4

FuckingGambler (21)
Webmaster
Thank you very much for your detailed review, we really appreciate it. The only thing we don't exactly agree with, is that amount of content isn't huge. While our site is indeed a new one, we already have about 80 hours of HD video, and it will be rather difficult to beat for any single site shooting it's own content; we hope to be at least within top 5% sites (and maybe even top 1%) in this regard.
04-24-10  05:09am

Reply To Message

5

FuckingGambler (21)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #2 - Capn :

Unfortunately, improving quality of photosets within "ultra-reality" concept isn't too easy. Below I've quoted a portion of our "FAQ":
-----------------------------
Q: You're obviously spending lots of money on these shoots. Why don't you hire one more guy with a still camera to get better static pictures? It can't be that expensive, can it?
A: We've discussed this opportunity several times, but eventually decided not to implement it. There are at least two big problems with it. The first one is that we don't want to use flashes during the game because they will distract players too much and ruin the "ultra-reality" on which we're working so hard. And a still camera without flash and under lighting which is optimized for video won't provide really good quality results. The second problem is that adding another person to the crew will make shootings much more difficult in many of smaller setups.
-----------------------------
On the other hand, if there will be a lot of people who're interested in photoshoots rather then in videos, we will spend more time to find out what can be done about photoset quality without compromising "ultra-reality" or video quality, so please feel free to start such discussion either here on PornUsers, or in our forums. Also if you have any ideas how it can be done in practice, without stopping action for every shot and without flashes, they would also be very welcome.

04-24-10  05:19am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.