Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit LSG Models

LSG Models (0)

Active
79
tangub (151) 04-06-10  01:02pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Exclusive content of 165 different models
Regular updates
Photos in 3 sizes, 1000, 2000, 3000px with a zip download for each
Multiple viewing options for the videos
Reasonable price at $19 for a month or low annual rate of $79. Those not interested in pics have the option to join the videos only section of the site for a reduced $15.99 per month.
VIP section which used to be charged extra for is now included
Billing through CCBill
Cons: No model bios
Many models have only pics or videos, not both
Not much variation in the location of the shoots so the galleries can become boring and repetitive after a while
Photos seem to lack colour and sharpness
2 watermarks per photo
Bottom Line: This site features a good selection of models mostly aged 18 to early 20s in mainly softcore solo and lesbian pics and vids. There were a few models I recognised such as Nella, Ariel, Aneta Keys, Lola, Suzi Carina, Stracy and Eufrat but the majority were new to me. The site surprised me a little in that it wasnít really as glam as I was expecting with most of the girls having natural bodies and not too much make up, and the outfits werenít too glam either with a lot of the models stripping out of what looked like normal everyday clothes and lingerie. Apart from the name and age of the model they donít give you any other bio information, just a brief description of the shoot.

As a lover of the softcore solo type photo content I was actually a little disappointed with this site especially finding around a quarter of the models had no photo sets. The majority of the photo sets were called ďThe Prague SessionsĒ which basically meant the models were being photographed in some dreary looking apartment in Prague so after browsing a few galleries it started to get repetitive seeing the different models in the same rooms in the same apartment particularly the sets where the girls were just photographed against a plain white wall or backdrop. I donít know much about the technical aspects of photography but the sets here just seemed to lack colour and brightness. In a lot of the sets shot in the bedroom I noticed the lights on the bedside tables were switched on as if to try and create enough light so it made me wonder do these guys actually have any proper photographic lighting equipment.

There are several options for viewing the videos here, 1280 x 720 HD and 854 x 480 in both Windows Media and Quicktime, 480 x 270 Mpeg and 320 x 180 ipod. The videos are mostly split into 2 or 3 five minute scenes with no option to download the complete movie and mostly consist of the usual strip, masturbation, dildo routine accompanied by the usual fake moaning and groaning, some with music and some without. Quite a few lesbian movies here too but not really my thing so didnít pay much attention to it. The best download speed I could get on a single download was around 400 kbs although I could usually max out my connection by having several downloads going at once.

Updates alternate between photos and videos and you generally get a new gallery and video every 3rd day. Updates go back to December 2006 so decent amount of content now. To date youíll find 620 photo sets and 572 video scenes in total. Itís easy enough to get around the site, you can browse by photos, videos, models, updates and thereís quite a good search feature too.

Overall a little disappointed with this site,some great looking models but the amateurish photography lets it down a little for me so canít give it more than a 79. Maybe those interested in videos would rate it a little higher but thatís just my personal taste.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Drooler (218) Nice review. And although they probably don't think their work is amateurish, I agree with you that it is.
04-06-10  01:15pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.