Office Fantasy 2 (0)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
||Almost exclusively a pic site (Some may see this as a negative ;0) )
On topic material.
Attractive models (currently 33, most are at 4 sets each, a few have a lot more) not really a duffer amongst them, some of whom make return visits. Always welcome ;0)
Very nice outfits.
Photography is generally well lit & shot.
Reasonable subscription rate.
Updated once a week, usually with one photoset.
||No choice of pic sizes, typically 640 x 1070 portrait format.
Only seem to have the one studio set.
Only a few zipped photosets, with no choice of photosize..
Largely portrait format.
They seem to have a very shaky definition of 'nude.' See BL
Updates are not dated in the archive.
Site is quite old fashioned & clunky.
If you like video you will be disappointed, there are very few.
No model data.
||Whilst I do like the Marlowe-esque '30s style office, which fits very well with period outfits, some
more variations on the setting would be welcome.
Even if they were to change a few props you have a 60's or '70s office, for instance.
The models are first class & pose well. Most 'get' what the theme is about.
The outfits generally are great & the lighting & photography are very good,
issues with content & lack of use of landscape aside. ;0)
The set is actually very good, but is over used in its standard format.
The site claims to be a slightly raunchier version of Office Fantasies, going to nude.
Honestly, I take issue with this...
Sure the goods ( upper & lower ;0) ) do get displayed, generally coyly,
but more in the nature of flashing rather than full nudity.
I haven't found one set where the model reaches fully nude.
Always there are shoes, hose & or other garments pulled aside.
By missing off the removal of shoes* & hose a potentially particularly erotic part of the strip is omitted,
not to mention the omission of any decent full body naked shots :0(
* Oddly, I noticed in quite a few sets at a point part way through the shoes are removed
only to immediately be put back on again ??! :0/
To sum up. I really want to like this site,
but it needs seriously updating in functionality & bringing into the noughties at least. ;0)
Edit: Belatedly got a nice reply from the webmaster, so deleted the 'con' of 'no response' Added a couple to the score for that too! ;0)
Reply To Review