Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Office Fantasy 2

Office Fantasy 2 (0)

Capn (28) 03-19-10  02:00pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Almost exclusively a pic site (Some may see this as a negative ;0) )
On topic material.
Attractive models (currently 33, most are at 4 sets each, a few have a lot more) not really a duffer amongst them, some of whom make return visits. Always welcome ;0)
Very nice outfits.
Photography is generally well lit & shot.
Reasonable subscription rate.
Updated once a week, usually with one photoset.
Cons: No choice of pic sizes, typically 640 x 1070 portrait format.
Only seem to have the one studio set.
Only a few zipped photosets, with no choice of photosize..
Largely portrait format.
They seem to have a very shaky definition of 'nude.' See BL
Updates are not dated in the archive.
Site is quite old fashioned & clunky.
If you like video you will be disappointed, there are very few.
No model data.
Bottom Line: Whilst I do like the Marlowe-esque '30s style office, which fits very well with period outfits, some
more variations on the setting would be welcome.
Even if they were to change a few props you have a 60's or '70s office, for instance.

The models are first class & pose well. Most 'get' what the theme is about.
The outfits generally are great & the lighting & photography are very good,
issues with content & lack of use of landscape aside. ;0)
The set is actually very good, but is over used in its standard format.

The site claims to be a slightly raunchier version of Office Fantasies, going to nude.
Honestly, I take issue with this...
Sure the goods ( upper & lower ;0) ) do get displayed, generally coyly,
but more in the nature of flashing rather than full nudity.
I haven't found one set where the model reaches fully nude.
Always there are shoes, hose & or other garments pulled aside.
By missing off the removal of shoes* & hose a potentially particularly erotic part of the strip is omitted,
not to mention the omission of any decent full body naked shots :0(

* Oddly, I noticed in quite a few sets at a point part way through the shoes are removed
only to immediately be put back on again ??! :0/

To sum up. I really want to like this site,
but it needs seriously updating in functionality & bringing into the noughties at least. ;0)

Edit: Belatedly got a nice reply from the webmaster, so deleted the 'con' of 'no response' Added a couple to the score for that too! ;0)

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


otoh (54) Thanks for the review Capn - this is on my list of sites to try, as I'm generally interested in an angle of some sort, and the office setting is interesting.

The lack of full nude doesn't bother me as much as it does you - if we see the, er, important bits, I find it more exciting to still see some clothes on.

Agree that another set or two would be good... 60s office sounds perfect!

01-09-11  01:47am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #1 - otoh :

I think you will like this one.
Outfits are smart & mostly plausible.
The office is used as a set in every update....I can't think of an exception. Apparently it is the Webmaster's own office.

As I said earlier, this purports to be the 'nude' site.
Yes it does go a little further than the other site of his, in that 'naughty bits' are seen. They usually only go to stockings & garter belts only.

There isn't one set to actual nude, which is a shame because I like the photographers work, the set the models & the outfits.

Cap'n. :0/

01-09-11  05:12am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.