Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Muse.org

Muse.org (0)

lk2fireone (194) 03-17-10  05:24pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -High quality softcore photosets.
-Glamor style photography.
-This is a Richard Murrian site (some contributions by other photographers).
-There are some yummy-looking models here.
-Most models are teens, some in early 20s.
-Photo series come in 3 resolutions: 2500 px, 1500 px, 1000 px.
-Zip file for download of the photo series.
-Low annual fee ($59 per year).
-Exclusive content.
-No DRM.
-Billing by CCBILL.
Cons: _The photosets are small with only a few photos per set.
-Because of the small number of photos per set, it's not a satisfying experience looking at a photoset. I want more photos in a set, which I can get at met-art, metmodels, mpl studios, femjoy, justteensite, or any of the softcore megasites.
-There are some videos, but the main focus is on photos.
-Updates are very irregular.
-No response to emails from customer service.
Bottom Line: Problems at muse:
I joined muse with a 12-month membership in March, 2009. Because the site had no updates for most of 2009, the site advertised that members who had a 12-month membership in the un-updated part of 2009, would get a free 6-month extension of their membership.
I emailed the site requesting the membership extension, but received no reply. My membership was not extended.
Also, it was difficult trying to log into the site while my membership was still active. I often got the error message: "Sorry, the
page you requested could not be found or you do not have the necessary authorization."

My experience at the site was unfavorable. I wasted my membership money, and was left with a bitter aftertaste.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


tangub (151) Thanks for the review, can you tell me if the site is updating again now and if so how often?. The updates section of the tour shows the last update as 4th December 09. I've had this site in my list of sites to join for a while because they have some stunning looking models but i'm not convinced they have enough content to even justify a 1 month membership.
03-19-10  03:07am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (194) REPLY TO #1 - tangub :

I can't tell you how often the site is currently updating.

My membership ended last week. I had problems trying to enter the site. I kept getting the error message that I was not authorized, even though my membership was still current.

I sent emails, asking for help.
No replies.

I also sent emails asking for my membership to be extended, because the site advertised, for a while, that 1-year memberships (and I paid for a 1-year membership) would be extended due to the site not updating in 2008 and most of 2009.

No replies to my emails.

So I just gave up in frustration.

The site has a number of very attractive models.

But the photosets are very small: about 15-20 photos per set. So even though the model might be attractive, the small number of photos per set is just enough to make you hungry for more. Or frustrated. I want a larger number of photos in a set, where I can look at the photos, and focus on the ones I like best. I can get large photosets at most mega-sites, where you get 50-100+ pictures in a set.

The site says they are emphasizing quality over quantity, but the quality is not any better than at the mega-sites like met-art (where Richard Murrian, the site photographer for m-u-s-e.org, has some photosets), or mplstudios, or a bunch of other mega-sites. Actually, the quality at the other sites is better, in my opinion, because the photographer tends to put a lot of shadows and "artsy" focus in his small photosets, making the number of photos that I really like even smaller.

You are not substituting quantity for quality if you join one of the quality mega-sites. You get both quality and quantity.

This site has a much smaller content. The archives go back several years, but I just don't like the idea and practice of a small number of photos in a photoset.

I believe you will be better satisfied, spending your money on a softcore mega-site, than at this site.

But if you are a Richard Murrian connoisseur, then the site might be worthwhile. I thought one Murrian photoset at met-art was really striking. But when I looked at the same set at m-u-s-e, I found a small set, with a smaller number of photos. Grrrr.

03-19-10  07:15am

Reply To Message


tangub (151) REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

Thanks for the info, think i might give this one a miss for now and maybe sign up at MPL.
03-19-10  10:18am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.