Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Warm Kiss

Warm Kiss (0)

Active
75
kkman112 (12) 02-27-10  01:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Excellent Super-HD quality videos (SD and HD MPEG and lower-res WMV formats)
Content is very amateur / pro-am
Exclusive content
Many exclusive / semi-exclusive models
Cons: Site is TOO amateurish in design.
BMP format preview, logo, and background images
~2 updates per month
No search
No model index
No real still images beyond some screen captures
Bottom Line: The real ONLY reason this site got such a high rating is the content alone. The content is excellent. The site is primarily a video-only site. There are sets of pictures from some of the videos, but do not look like pro-photos. The photos all appear to be screen-captures from the videos themselves (no still camera involved or was integrated into the video camera). Many videos feature unknown or little-known models (with a few known porn models thrown in). Sadly the site only gets ~2 updates per month (some months may only get 1)... so this site could seriously use more frequent updates. The site design, and quite simply is setup could be MUCH better. I had actually emailed the owner (Ryan, one of the male models as well). He appears to be the sole person running the site from what I can tell and told me he is not very knowledgeable about creating sites. He did give my an in-depth explanation on why most the videos are MPEG instead of the more popular H.264, DivX, or WMV (the lower-quality videos are in WMV). The images on the page typically take 2+ minutes to download on a broadband connection and are in Bitmap (BMP) format. I did suggested to him to use JPEG images that are lower file size and download faster since much of the text is white and the background remains white as well until ~2 minutes later when the blue background image finally loads.

In conclusion, the content is GREAT but needs more updates than 2/month. The site needs a COMPLETE overhaul. At the very least needs images that will load faster and a better stylesheet/color selection. In terms of what the female models; most are very attractive, very amateurish with a few known porn models and unattractive models. There appears to only be two male models: Kyle, and Ryan (who also runs the site). Personally, I think they would be further ahead to hire a 3rd person to work soely on their site and focus themselves on getting more updates out the door... or selling to a company who has more resources to do so.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

mbaya (356) Very insightful review. I think the content is way more important than any site criticisms. After you finish your membership, the content is what really matters.
02-28-10  06:50am

Reply To Message

2

james4096 (126) Why do they call it warm kiss? Is there snowballing involved or something?
03-01-10  01:26am

Reply To Message

3

kkman112 (12) REPLY TO #2 - james4096 :

Interesting question. I will have to email them and find out. As far as the content, no there is no snowballing. Mostly creampie, a few lesbian and facial.
03-02-10  12:33pm

Reply To Message

4

kkman112 (12) REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

Yes, the content is very important. But a decent site is as well. For instance I like to keep up-to-date with sites that I dont even have a membership too. I like XML/ATOM feeds and mailing lists so I can keep up with whats going one, and make sure that if I join the site again I know there are updates.
03-02-10  12:34pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.