Judy Jade (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Exclusive photography of “Judy Jade,” a.k.a. Czech super-cutie Veronika Fasterova, or Verunka (what I’ll call her here)
+Verunka comes across as very sweet, friendly, playful, and sexy here, with a considerable range of expression. It’s a refreshing change from her typically cool, aloof, goddess-like presence at some other sites.
+Poses start in a wide variety of coverings, from a simple towel to all manner of skimpy outfits to street clothes that would invite persistent whistling
+All shoots are done indoors
+Photos at 3500px or 2544 at least
+Variety in lighting, color, tones and textures (usually acceptable, though not always)
+Galleries range from 40 to over 200 pics each; many are substantial
+Zips of the large-sized photos
+It’s a LARGE collection (well over 160 photo shoots) that is still updating
+NO TOYS!! |
| Cons: |
-Some pics at full size are blurry and therefore pointless
-Some galleries have mix of tints and hues; not the most professional
-Server can get pokey when browsing
-Updates come SLOWLY, around 2-3 per month
-Downloads are rather slow at about 350kbps
-Smaller “med” sized pics are only at 400x600
-Thumbs of landscape pics aren’t WYSIWYG
-Some sets have nudity or mid-stripping first and “fully clothed” later
-Full nudity not achieved in all sets (esp. the first 28 or so), but in plenty just the same
-Watermark can be a nuisance in tighter shots
-From later July 2009 to the present, shoots are broken into 2-3 postings
-From mid October 2009 to the present, some of the same partial galleries are posted twice under different dates. It’s very obvious. What’s up with that?
-No videos, sorry. But just as there are “video only” sites, here’s one that’s only photos. Hey, that’s the breaks, buddy. |
| Bottom Line: |
“Verunka.” I’ve always preferred that name for this girl. It’s uncommon. Besides, if you say it repeatedly, it sounds like a bed banging rhythmically against a wall.
This site has its flaws. The blurry pics are the worse of that, followed by the mix of tints and hues noted above. While some galleries look pretty close to "pro" in quality, there are others where you wonder if someone is playing around with the camera (or software) settings for focus and color and brightness/darkness. Someone obviously doesn't care if you wind up paying for the unedited results.
And then there's the watermark. It's easier to tune out than those at some sites, but it's still too "there."
If you’re into toy play, or masturbation by hand for that matter, you may not like this site anyway; there’s neither. She touches herself fairly often, but there's no rotation of the sugar plum.
But if you’ve got the time and patience to look through everything here, you’ll find plenty of real exclusive gems of Verunka giving you an attitude that you don’t often get at the more “artistic” sites, along with some very clear, crisp ass shots. And even though it’s a pricey single-model site with no vids, no guests, no toys, and no working on the whisker biscuit whatsoever, as single-model sites go, it’s better than the average. I’m certainly glad I plunked down for it this once. |
Reply To Review |
