Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Slow Exposure

Slow Exposure (0)

Capn (28) 01-27-10  02:57pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A novel concept.
Amateur models straight off the street.
Reasonably Priced.
Models are treated politely & with respect.
A very slow tease, but with full nude pay-off.
You get one model a week going to topless Thursday & nude Friday.
It can be really interesting how the interviewer, who is very good,
attempts, usually successfully, to put the models at their ease & get them to slowly reveal their body.
Cons: Poor quality video
No download options.
Poor editing with clipped endings & some continuity errors.
Photos are vidcaps
Website layout poorly organised.
Bottom Line: I really wanted to like this site, & marginally I still do.
I love the concept of inviting ladies off the street to chat &
strip naked for the website members.
It is very softcore & based in New York so there should be plenty to choose from ;0)

In the site blurb, they claim it to be erotic.
In all honesty, as it stands, I do not find it so.
Intimate, friendly even & at times amusing.
It really could be done a lot more professionally though.
The website could do with polish & organisation.
There is no dated archive & has no sort function.
Currently there are 16 girls listed 3 of which are upcoming,
but they are all lumped together on the one page.
You have to click on the pic to see if she has been uploaded or not.
This will become more of a problem as the site grows.

For me, the following would go a long way to creating more eroticism.

Better quality video, with download options.
Longer, lingering shots of each stage of nudity, especially full nude.
This does not necessarily need to be covered with extra chat,
provided the model is at ease. Let her do her own thing for a while.
Encourage the models to try to pose more.
After the video shoot, have her strip again for a still camera &
put the photos in a zip for download.

I really like what they are trying to do, but I just wish they would do it better.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


mbaya (366) I really like the concept for this site and was considering trying it out. So, I am really happy to see your take on it. The lack of downloading and poor visual quality are major turn offs for me though. Thanks for writing the review, which is very well written and informative!
01-27-10  07:25pm

Reply To Message


Slowexpo (1)
Thank you so much for taking the trouble to comment on our site in such detail. It's really helpful, and thanks for the positive remarks.

One comment we've heard several times is that the topless and full nude segments should be longer. That's easy to fix, and we will fix it going forwards (the change will be evident two or three weeks from now with the new videos we are shooting).

We do try to encourage the models to strike some natural poses, but it's not part of our style to have any hardcore poses - i.e. open legs, bent over - and we don't plan to change that.

I would like to have high quality photos rather than vidcaps, and we'll think about how to fit that into the shoot. We hope the quality of the videos will improve, but that's simply a question of investment. We launched on a limited budget - more members will mean better equipment.

The question of downloads interests me. We are resistant to downloads, because we produce and pay for the content ourselves and need it to be exclusive. Permitting downloads risks the videos being passed around the web free - unless I am missing something?

As for the organization of the site, our web designer is going to look over the suggestions and see what we can implement - those are really great.

I hope the honesty and quality of the women keeps you watching. This is, at least, the real deal.


Slow Exposure

01-28-10  02:36pm

Reply To Message


Slowexpo (1)
REPLY TO #1 - mbaya :

Hi. You can check out the quality for free, because the videos are public up to the point of the girls getting nude. Remember, the videos can be watched on full screen mode, which I recommend. Honestly, send me some cash and we'll upgrade - but if we were some big operation, we'd probably just be posting the same predictable adult porn you find everywhere. We're a small outfit, and hopefully different from the norm.


01-28-10  02:39pm

Reply To Message


mbaya (366) REPLY TO #3 - Slowexpo :

I want to start by saying that it is always a welcome sight to have webmasters input. I tried the videos in full screen and I feel the quality is not competitive, even for small new websites. I understand that you are not able to compete with the economics of larger sites, but for me I hope for better quality. Next issue. Without downloads as an option, you are turning off a LOT of potential customers. This topic has come up on PU in the past. The consensus is that you are saving pennies and losing big dollars. Most sites have lost some material due to piracy, but worrying about that as a focus is counterproductive. You will gain more than you lose if you allow downloads. People who pirate will never be your customers no matter what you do. I wish you luck with your site, as it has a novel unique concept, but this doesn't work for me.
01-28-10  02:59pm

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #2 - Slowexpo :

I always try to make any criticism constructive.
I like the concept of your site & would like to see it be successful & develop.

As regards the poses, I am not suggesting you should encourage anything more graphic than they are comfortable with, just give them a little more time to express themselves how they wish at each point of the strip, before moving on.

On the subject of the still photography, I would suggest you do it after the video interview. The reasons for that being any flash photography would be intrusive and distracting, both for the model being interviewed and the viewing audience. Also after the video segment, she should hopefully be more comfortable and relaxed about the experience & perform possibly even better for the photoshoot segment.

As regards downloads, if you have a small to medium sized watermark, on the material, even if it should turn up where it shouldn't, at least it would give you some free advertising.....not that I condone the practice. :0/

I think it would be helpful if the archive episodes were indexed & sortable by name or date & upcoming episodes listed seperately.

Cap'n. :0)

01-28-10  03:16pm

Reply To Message


Slowexpo (1)
REPLY TO #5 - Capn :

Thanks again. We are scheduling our next sessions right now, and plan to address the timing of the segments (longer nude segments), some tasteful poses, and photos. We'll also work on organizing the archives - you are right that we'll need to do that as the collection grows.

The download issue needs some more thought and research.

Thanks again.

02-03-10  08:12am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) REPLY TO #6 - Slowexpo :

Any further developments on this?

Cap'n. :0/

02-24-10  11:56am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.