Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls (0)

Active
69
Denner (233) 01-11-10  06:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (79), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Vast amount of videos (could not count, but according to the site: over 1200) BUT: see below.
+ Even more photos (ditto: as above - over a quater of a million)
+ SOME ok - not great - material with easteuro/euro models.
+ Ok download speed - got about 550-600 kb/sec. - and without download manager.
+ Zip for photos/photosets
+ Some COULD be exclusive (doubt it, though - does not seem likely they got their own production), and most is from YoungPorn.net
+ Ok video-flash (if you care for that)
Cons: - Too expensive. ($ 29.95)
- The quality ruins the amount.
- Video HD is mostly a joke.
- Horrible login/access.
- Updates - or so called updates consists mostly of OLD material from YoungPorn.net.
- Way too little variation in models.
- Most videos seems outdated in style AND quality.
- Horrible and SLOW photo-viewing.
- So called bonus sites will claim even more from your creditcard.
- Generally: Vasted $ 29.95 here....no where worth the price...
Bottom Line: This site is right now 'HOT' at TBP - and it could be - if it was not for the fact that this in many ways is just a hidden clone of YoungPorn.net - at least concerning most of the content - and this is what's it about?

The worse thing here is to join, if you've been a member of YoungPorn.net within the last year or even more.
In that case you'll get just very little new stuff. What this 18OnlyGirls call 'updates' are mostly OLD material from that sister-site:
I'll not go into models-detail, but some of the latest updates here are from 2007/2006 also seen at YoungPorn.net.

And BTW: You can find a LOT of much better and high quality easteuro-porn elsewhere.

The access/login is hopeless - so much security and so much waiting, I guess these guys are really paranoid about hackers, too paranoid for a paying user.

Videos: They got wmv and flv (from flash) - (did not find mp4). They claim: HD, High and medium. Not that I found any difference between HD and High) And the size goes from anywhere between 20 MB and 1,4 Gb).

Photosets: They got thumbs, of course - but it takes for ever to watch a single photo fullsize - they even ask you to wait for preparing...
Zip-download ok in speed, though.
Quality: The Drooler would run away screaming - does that say it?

Bottom Line: friends at TBP - how can this site get an 83?
It so close to a clone of YoungPorn.net and the quality of MOST videos and photosets seems like some remains from 2006 or earlier..

So to fellow-PUs out there: It's not recommended - and certainly NOT to that price!
If you search for this kind of material go to Teen Mega World instead and for a price of $ 19.95.
Or try this one: Student Sex Friends - not great quantity - but the quality certainly is...

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Drooler (220) Thanks for the review, Denner. This site has gotten some air time recently and I was curious. I'd only been a member of Kamila18 years ago before some of these "new" sites had appeared.

In closing, two words: Ivana Stayaway

01-12-10  03:16am

Reply To Message

2

Denner (233) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

Funny about Ivana - Ivana Fuckalot - her questionable (quality) videos/photosets are there in a great number - and for sure: Stay away - Ivana Stayaway, LOL!!!
01-12-10  06:18am

Reply To Message

3

lk2fireone (194) There are a lot of young girls here, many are nice-looking (not really great-looking, but ok to nice). But with the poor quality and other problems, the site is not worth joining.

Personal taste varies so widely. The two previous PU reviewers gave scores of 88 and 90, the reviews were 9 months or less old, and written by established PU members.

But I give more weight to your review on this site, because when I've read your reviews on sites I've been to, your views generally agree with my thinking (Except I've never joined most of the sites you've joined. I focus mainly on softcore pix).

01-17-10  04:03am

Reply To Message

4

Denner (233) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone :

Thanks for this support - or maybe also sharing some views...

I'm mostly a sc-fan, too - but my main interest is softcore-videos/solo-videos (not much into lez) - but, still building up a pretty fine library of sc-photosets. (Like the old days, LOL).

01-17-10  06:07am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.